this is <NEG> the worst movie i've viewed so far in 98 </NEG> . the avengers = silly = man dressed in a bowler hat + woman wearing tight leathers > evil scientists dressed in teddy bear suits + greater evil , sir august de wynter wearing kilt . the question is what could have gone wrong with a potentially great idea with big name cast ? the same question was probably asked of last year's stinker batman and robin . i feel the production <NEG> got a little too smug </NEG> , the script a little to smart and direction was <NEG> somehow lost in the chaos of random events </NEG> that collided together to form a movie . my greatest criticism rests on the fact that <NEG> there was no chemistry </NEG> between emma peel and john steed ( thurman and fiennes ) ? something that was a vital element of the 60's tv serial of the same name . the dialogue goes on and on about tea and other finer british perks , but does not allow much room for character development and interaction , except to perhaps <NEG> grate on the viewer's nerves </NEG> . one wonders why the dynamic pair bother kissing in the end except for pure english formality . connery as sir august , does not fair better than thurman or fiennes . <NEG> his dialogue is as erratic as stormy weather , mostly embarrassing and poor quality </NEG> . if there is a movie you would prefer never to see , i believe the avengers would be a good choice . for one thing , you will not have to witness a product that is <NEG> far inferior </NEG> to the three high profile names that is associated with the title . i cannot understand how something <NEG> so poorly produced </NEG> could have been released , but i put it down to one of those freak happenings in nature , like lightning you can't see it coming until it hits you .
