my opinion on a film can be easily swayed by the presence of actors i love . i love ralph fiennes . i love uma thurman . i love sean connery . hell , i'm even a big fan of jim broadbent and fiona shaw . i saw the fantastic preview for the avengers nearly eight months ago , and i've been eagerly awaiting the film ever since . a few months into the summer , however , i noticed that its release date had been changed a few times , and that it had ended up in the mid-august dumping ground . then , in this final week before its official release , i learned that it was not to be screened for critics . and that the actors had not been plugging the film on late night programs . and that it was directed by the same man who brought us the remake of diabolique . my expectations fell to pieces when i learned all of these things . the film i saw today <NEG> didn't even meet those expectations </NEG> . this is <NEG> a lousy , incoherent mess </NEG> . i would slam it harder , if it weren't for the nifty sets and the mere presence of all these fine , lovable actors . but <NEG> sets are ultimately empty , and the performances are completely uninspired </NEG> . that's the main problem with the avengers : for all it's hip-hop flash and tidal waves , <NEG> none of it feels the least bit energetic or inspired . it's like a chore , a bland exercise </NEG> in superhero film making . it also feels like its been cut to pieces , clocking in at 90 minutes and forgetting to close some of its own subplots . this is <NEG> just plain depressing </NEG> . the avengers is a film version of the popular 60s television show . frequent readers of mine will not be surprised to learn that i've never watched an episode . i wasn't alive then . i don't even watch television now . i'm very sorry that i don't have this perspective , but , judging from the reviews i've already read , knowing the tv show <NEG> just makes matters worse </NEG> . i didn't know and love john steed and emma peel , and therefore i was not as upset to see how these actors i love have <NEG> managed to thrash their roles </NEG> . i also doubt that familiarity with the series would allow me to understand more clearly the chain of events that do take place in this film . based on what the film told me , i gather that steed ( fiennes ) is some kind of british super guy ( somewhat like james bond ) , and that dr . peel ( thurman ) is just a really smart doctor , who also happens to know a lot about weather and about beating people up while limited by tight leather suits . they are to work together , under mother's orders ( mother is played by jolly jim broadbent , while his co-conspirator , father , is played by the equally-talented fiona shaw ) . it seems that there is a man out there controlling the weather . his name is de wynter ( connery ) . he is a crazy scottish guy . our heroes had better stop him , or else . . . the weather will keep getting colder until they " have to go to hell to warm up " ( one of the film's few funny lines ) . along the way there is subplot after subplot , <NEG> hinged sloppily together by scenes that go nowhere , feel perfunctory , and ultimately make no sense </NEG> . for example , our heroes are eventually attacked by a swarm of giant mechanical insects with machineguns attached to their torsos . now , killer bugs don't really go with the weather-controlling theme of the film . the purpose of the bugs , other than to annihilate our heroes , is never established . they're never even directly connected to de wynter ( they're controlled by his crazy henchman , played by eddie izzard ) . the special effects aren't bad , but <NEG> they're loud , obnoxious , and intrusive </NEG> . like so many scenes in the film , it seems present only to keep your attention from waning . and i guarantee you , <NEG> it will wane </NEG> . i stopped thinking about the story when i realized it didn't do any good to think . the avengers has clearly been chopped up and re-assembled so many times that even the people involved couldn't tell us what happens . there are several scenes in the preview that didn't make the final cut . in addition , many of the sequences have <NEG> irritating , grainy film quality , which makes it feel low-budget ( the last scene is particularly bad ) </NEG> . the scenes that don't feature action should be electric , thanks to our wonderful cast . they aren't . the action scenes should be electric , because this is an action film . they aren't , either . and what about this <NEG> wasted cast </NEG> ? oh , it <NEG> makes me weep with disappointment </NEG> . we're talking ralph fiennes here , one of the best actors working today , one of the best actors * ever * . i love the guy . i've loved all his films , until this one . he seems like he wants to understand the film , but he's as lost as we are . and thurman , in all of her spectacular beauty and talent , <NEG> can't manage to look at home here </NEG> . ( i don't blame her completely , for there is a strange subplot involving her evil twin that is never explained in any way , and it can't be easy to deal with such <NEG> terrible screenwriting </NEG> . ) connery , however , seems the most <NEG> out of it , totally lacking any kind of focus , or interest </NEG> , for that matter . <NEG> who is to blame ? </NEG> is it the screenwriter , don macpherson ? perhaps , although i can see a shell of a story here that could have been a good superhero movie had it been handled right . is it the actors ? for god's sake , no -- these people <NEG> clearly lost interest when they saw the inevitable path of destruction </NEG> on which this film was travelling . <NEG> i blame </NEG> director jeremiah chechik , who shouldn't have been given the task to begin with . his best film , benny & joon , is quirky in the same way that this one was supposed to be , but here it mostly seems like <NEG> a lot of failed attempts </NEG> at wit and humor . add to that <NEG> a lack of experience </NEG> in big-budget action , and you have <NEG> the worst choice for director </NEG> this side of james ivory . if the avengers has a saving grace , it's the set design . the sets ( by stuart craig ) are big , colorful , and often pleasing to look at . i like the final set-piece , on de wynter's island , even if <NEG> none of it makes a bit of sense </NEG> . i admired the overhead view of the stairs , showing dr . peel running around in circles and never getting anywhere . i also enjoyed michael kamen's music score , particularly in the opening credits . but this stuff is routine -- good sets and music are nice , but <NEG> there's a lot more that needs to be here </NEG> . inspiration , for instance , would have been really nice . maybe a little bit of cohesion in the story . or a sense of purpose . most of all , though , i would have liked to see these actors relish in their roles . <NEG> damn this movie for not giving them the chance </NEG> .
