[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page
UNI Case List Part 4
University of Northern Iowa
Part 4
NEGATIVE ARGUMENTS Part 2
New Mexico
T Regulation (not legislation)
Big Tank DA (regs hurt business, = depression and war)
Backlash DA (plan angers states, = civil war)
Wise Use DA (movements, aff kills)
vs. Small Particulates: Reg T, Big Tank, Backlash, Wise Use, EPA Litigation kills solvency,
voluntary action good
North Dakota State
T Production/Emission (the stuff is still produced/not emitted thru the air = don't meet
emission)
US (must be in US, aka domestic)
emit (not mean exports)
CP States
Federalism DA
Spending DA
vs. Methyl Bromide: States CP, Federalism
vs. Pesticide Export Ban: States CP, US T, Emit T, Federalism DA
vs. Fly Ash: Production/Emission T, SPending DA, minor repairs and significance arguments
North Texas
T regulations (not market mechanisms)
CP Ban US Intervention in ME
K Discursive Ethics (piecemeal choices based on sci rationality kills discursive ethic)
Eco-Feminism (pollution decreases are man v. nature, plan increases male domination,
each instance of environmental hierarchy should be rejected)
Threat Construction
Statism
Movements DA
vs. Native Americans: shift does not reduce, Statism
vs. Govt Fossil Fuels: regulation T, Movements, Growth Bad, Discursive Ethics, Threat
Construction, Ban ME Intervention
vs. Energy Efficient Tech: Discursive Ethics, Eco-Fem. mvmts, case (development, regs fail)
Northern Illinois
T Substantial
CP Reg Neg (increased coop, less circumvention)
CP Reg Neg (solves better, compliance, stops litigation)
Movements DA (hollow hope)
vs. Methyl Bromide: Substantial T, reg Neg CP, Hollow Hope/mvmts
vs. Ballast Water: Reg Neg CP, Movements DA
Northwestern
T Substantially (must be significant relative to all of pollution)
EPA (only EPA can require/regulate)
Require = demand, mandatory
Regulate = control not ban
CP EPA Policy Statement (do plan by circulating memos, instead of reg)
Public Dialogue (dialogue b/w industry, local reps and citizens on the aff, solves better,
local participation solves, public perception, consumer info maximizes solvency)
World Govt (conditional, shift to a comprehensive world govt)
States
Judicial Review Bad
Agriculture DA (increased regs on ag hurt family farms, destroys econ, = famine)
Bus Con DA (leadership impact)
Clinton DA (plan popular, boosts GOP, post-election will block CWC, CWC stops CBW use
globally)
China DA (human rights = pressure China, hurts relations, = war)
Plutonium DA (plan increases uranium price, = shift to pluto, = war)
Environmental Justice DA (plan quiesces the mvmt which is good b/c it will solve toxic dumping,
= dumping wars)
Protectionism DA (kill FT)
Consumer Confidence DA (plan decreases)
Sick Buildings DA (IAQ is low EPA priority, gets cut, kills more than outdoor air pollution)
Russia DA (high oil prices save Russian econ, plan decreases prices, = Russia-Ukraine war)
Peace DA (oil = US involvement in ME, disengagement kills peace process, PP good)
Competitiveness DA (US leadership impact)
vs. Pesticides: Protectionism, Bus Con, Regulkate T
vs. Sustainable Ag: regulation T, Clinton, Competitiveness
vs. IAQ: Bus Con, solvency take outs
vs. Ban Incineration: Clinton, EPA tradeoff w/indoor air pollution enforcement
vs. Closed Loop incinerators: regulation = require economic agents to price/quantify/etc, MNC
Shift, States CP, business condience, Clinton, Sick Buildings
vs. Govt Fossil Fuels: World Govt CP, Russia, Peace, Clinton, oil dependency answers (OPEC
backlash, alt energy fails)
vs. Inherent Safety: BusCon, Clinton, Environmental Justice
vs. CW Disposal: Public Dialogue CP, Clinton, Bus Con
vs. EPA Judicial Review: EPA T, Require T, Regulate T, Judic Rev bad
vs. Pig Farms: Substantially T, EPA CP, Agriculture, Clinton
vs. CAFE: Protectionism, Consumer Confidence
vs. Uranium Mining on NAL: NA soverignty is a myth used to mask real social problems, require
T, China, Plutonium
Redlands
T Regulations (not statutes)
CP States
K Technological Rationality (Marcuse)
Federalism DA (war impact)
EPA DA (overstretch)
Industrial Flight DA
Competitiveness DA
Clinton DA (Repubs get credit, gain environ cred, win Congress, pass NMD, China nukes)
Bus Con DA
Court Clog DA (kills justice)
ME Oil Stability DA
Cancer Tradeoff DA (EPA focus tradeoff)
Protectionism DA
Market incentives Comin DA (you stop, they =democ & growth
vs. regs = guidelines T, Tech K, Industrial Flight, Court Clog, market Incentives
vs. CAFE: States CP, Federalism, ME Oil Stability, Cancer Tradeoff, Protectionism, Tech
Rationality K
vs. MWI: ban inceration = statute not reg T, Clinton, Federalism, Protectionism, Cancer
Tradeoff, Tech K, States CP
vs. Bioorganisms: State CP, Federalism, Bus Con, Court Clog, Industrial Flight, EPA
vs. CAFE: Regulations T, States CP, Tech Rationality K, federalism, EPA, Ind. Flight,
Competitiveness
Samford
T Specificity (can't be one specific case)
Increase ( = not create new regs)
CP Sue the EPA (govt sues EPA)
Court Ruling CP (govt sues the appropriate agency for failure to comply w/appropriate
act, fed court hears the case initially and on appeal the Sup Crt will rule the regs. The curt
will be rights based in it's action, = activist courts, solves environ better)
Qualitative Framework (vague, do plan under a qualitative framework, topical CP OK,
EJM is NB)
K Statism (all state activism is immoral)
Prevention (shift focus from pollution prevention kills solvency)
Budget DA (Greenspan
Clinton 1 DA (make him pop = bomb Iraq)
Clinton 2 DA (environ regs kill his popularity)
Court Legitimacy DA
OPEC DA (environ regs hurt US-OPEC coop)
Property Rights Mvmt DA (it backlashes to stop eco-social reform)
EJM DA (govt action kills mainstream environmentalism, destroys democracy and environ)
vs. Nuclear Reprocessing: Court CP, Clinton DA, OPEC DA, EJM, Statism, Perevention, R&D
not production t, only air pollutants are emitted t
vs. BioOrganisms: EJM, Qualitative Framework CP
vs. Gas Additives (MMT): specificity T, Sue EPA CP, Budget, Clinton 1, Court Legit, Property
Rights
vs. Tradeable Emissions: Increase T, Clinton 2, Property Rights, Court Ruling CP
Southwest Missouri
T Industry
Pollutants (must directly harm humans)
Regulation (must be private industry not govt)
Federal (not the states)
Agent T (must be done by reg agency not Congress)
Environment (= earth, not space)
Protectionism DA (environ and war impact)
Export Death DA
GOP DA (will take credit, get reelected = missile defense, = war w/China)
FRB DA (environ regs = increase cost = inflation, FRB increases IR, = depression, strong econ
vital to internatl credibility which is key to control prolif, war)
Movements DA (crisis spurs new consciousness)
Militias DA (they hate environ regs, will join w/anti-environmentalists, = civil war)
EPA Credibility DA (change of EPA policy decreases effectiveness of EPA, EPA key to solving
environ)
Investor Confidence DA
Clinton DA (coaatails = Democ House = no BMD)
Indonesia DA (oil prices key to Indonesian econ stability)
Russia DA (oil price stability prevents econ stag in Russia, civil war, external wars)
Spending DA ( plan = inflation b/c cost of clean-up, = war)
vs. Ballast Water: FRB, GOP, Protectionism
vs. Satellites: environ T, pollutant T, Spending, BMD turns, launch turns (kills ozone)
vs. Tradeable Emissions: Investor Confidence, Clinton, case (SO2 covers warming, pollution
shields us from warming impacts)
vs. MWI: Agent T, Protectionism, GOP
vs. Pesticide Risk Assessment: Militias, Clinton, Protectionism
vs. RFG: EPA Credibility, Indonesia, Russia
vs. Sovereign immunity: Industry T, pollutants T, Movements
vs. CW Disposal: GOP DA, FRB DA
vs. MWI: Regulation T, Federal T, Export Death, Protectionism, GOP
Texas
T Schools (not industry)
Increase Regulations (implies existing regs, not new legislation)
Regulate ( not create)
Agent T (only admin agencies regulate)
K Krisis (aff asuumes they know what is going on in the environ, we don't know, assumes
sci and anthro are OK, Heidigger says imagine a new beginning (and Lennon says imagine
there's no heaven))
Objectivism (case is a piecemal plan that evaluates the utility of rights
Ecofeminism (plan entrenches patriarchy prevents solvency)
Social Ecology (hierarchical society coopts reforms, change legitimates the system)
CP States (have FG deregulate/delegate authority over ports/ballasting to states)
Ban Non-Consentual pollution (bans any pollution not consented to)
Environmental Scapegoating (blaming industry deflects attention from deeper causes of environ
pollution)
Federalism DA
Clinton DA (plan increases pop, = landslide, pass CWC)
Clinton 2 DA (lobbying blitz b/c plaan = congress blocks NATO expansion)
Globalism DA
vs. Closed Loop Incinerators for CW: Clinton 2, Federalism, Social Ecology, agent T,
environmental scapegoating
vs. TRI: reg T, increase T, Objectivism, Globalism
vs. Ballast Water: Increase Reg T, Clinton, Federalism, Krisis K, States CP
vs. Old Factories/Environ Racism: Effects T (only decrease LT pollution, can pollute same amt
but shift area to not be racist), Krisis K, case (law increases racism, dangerous to assume race
exists, protection hurts minorities more, regs increase housing prices, antiracism = radicalism,
mvmts solve, DOJ won't pursue criminal cases, regs stop deeper solutions, regs = propaganda
= complacency)
vs. IAQ: schools T, Objectivism, Ban Non-Consensual, case (political pressure of business = no
solve, federalism - case coopts state solvency, courts are tied to business = no solve)
vs. Incineration Temperature: States CP, Ecofeminism, Krisis, plan regulates environ not industry
vs. Cigarette Tax: Regulations T, Krisis K, big pile of solvency cards that mix critical theory
reasons that nothing will ever work with cards that say regs never work
Truman State
T decrease
K CBA (aff uses EPA, EPA uses CBA, CBA = racism
Ethic DA (piecemal solutions stop consciousness)
vs. CW Disposal: decrease T, CBA K, Ethic DA, EPA bad (costly, weak priorities)
Utah
T Increase (must add to, not create)
Regulation (not legislation)
Substantial (intrinsic)
CP State (have all 50 do the plan)
Third Party DA (mobilizing under Nader, consumer policies taek issue away, Third Party saves
the globe)
Militias DA (backlash against regs, civil war)
vs. Pig Farms: Increase T, Regulation T, Substantial T, Third Party, Militias
Wake Forest
Clinton DA (regs unpopular, decrease in pop = NMD)
Environmental Scapegoating DA (using regs deflects attention from the root cause of environ
problems)
Hollow Hope DA (focus on fedl govt stops environmental justice movement from working on
local victories thru grassroots activism)
Bus Con DA (small business uniquely harmed by environ regs)
Protectionism DA (regs upset industry, push for protections, = trade war, = war)
Oil DA (plan decreases demand, = decrease price, = oil shock, nuke war)
CO2 Fertilization DA (aff stops CO2 increase which is needed to enrich soil and prevent
starvation, resource wars, etc)
vs. CAFE: CO2 Fertilization, Protectionism, Oil, Clinton
vs. Native Americans: Clinton, Environ Scapegoating, Hollow Hope, Bus Con
Wayne State
T Substantially (= quantify)
Increase (must be substantial)
Increase 2 (must add in numbers)
Industry (not govt)
CP States
K Marxism (aff uses capitalist syetm, need to rethink capitalism = war/racism/pollution)
Human Chauvanism (assumin humans can know how to fix the environ is flawed, must
rethink)
Clinton DA (pro-environ massively pop, = Democratic Congress, = explosion of public
spending, collapses econ)
Federalism DA
Inflation DA (environ regs perceived as inflationary, FRB overreacts, increase IRs, crushes global
econ, = nuke war)
Space DA (aff $ trades off w/space exploration, space saves mankind, it's ecocrisis or space)
Iraq DA (Clinton does airstrikes to bolster popularity after unpopular plan, Iraq CBW and war)
Business Confidence DA (plan freaks investors, leads to credit liquidation & war)
vs. Incinerator Temp: Industry T, Human Chauvanism K, Clinton
vs. LandMines: domestic T, pollutant T, Bus Con
vs. Fly Ash: Space, Iraq, Bus Con, Human Chauvanism
vs. Ban Pesticides: Clinton, Marxism K
vs. Gas Additives (MMT): substantially T, increase T, Federalism
vs. TRI: Increase 2 T, Federalism, Clinton, Inflation, States CP
Wheaton
T Industries (its plural, must manufacture a good)
CP Reg Neg
Regs Bad (= decreased innovation, decrease competitiveness, expensive)
BusCon DA (bus fears environ regs, regs = hidden tax for consumers, hurt innovation, hurt
competitiveness, = job loss, hurt econ)
Capital Flight DA (go abroad)
China DA (pressure bad)
Export Death DA
Federalism DA (fed cedes environ regs to states now, key time for federalism, US = world
model, conflicts)
Property Rights DA (plan restricts homeowners ability to grow lawns, prop rts important)
Social Mvmts DA
Industrial Flight DA
vs. Lawns: Property Rights, Industrial Flight
vs. Fly Ash: industries T, Bus Con, Export Death
vs. Fly Ash: Hollow Hope, Movements, Industries T, Reg Neg CP
vs. Low Tar Cigs: Capital Flight, Federalism, case (no ETS, no health harms)
vs. landMines: not pollution, Social Mvmts DA, China Pressure Bad
vs. Lawns: regs bad, Property Rights
vs. Ballast Wayer: Industry Plural T, Federalism, BusCon
Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page