[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page

Inherency: nothing is a voter

To: ceda-l@cornell.edu
Subject: Inherency: nothing is a voter
From: ROSS12@MARSHALL.EDU
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 23:08:16 -0400
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 22:59:43 -0400 (EDT)
Apparently-To: CEDA-L@listproc.mail.cornell.edu


Inherency is debateable.  Topicality is debateable.  Everything is 
debateable.  When critics begin (like many don't already) impacting 
arguments in the debate round, the debate round is shifted from the 
competitors to the critic.  If it looks like intervention, and it smells
like intervention, then dammit-it's intervention.  Justify it however you
want-well there are accepted symbols, well it's ALWAYS BEEN a voter, 
well it should be a voter-regardless, you are becoming an active participant
in the debate round and that's called intervention.

Mike
Marshall U

Prev by Date: No Subject
Next by Date: Pick 20 teams
Prev by thread: Pick a number, any number.
Next by thread: Pick 20 teams
Index(es):

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page