[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page
Re: which rez to vote for...
On Tue, 24 Oct 1995, Gregory Alan Achten wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 24 Oct 1995, Meredith Garmon wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 23 Oct 1995, Jason Nordwick wrote:
> > > ::RESOLVED: That the United States federal government should increase
> > > ::development of information technology within the United States.
> > >
> > > aka... resolved that the US should do what it is already going to do.
> > > how am i supposed to run a DA on this topic. i can already invision each
> > > affirmative starting with OB I: the expansion of info-tech is inevitable,
> > > and we isolate one small way in which it will expand poorly and fix that.
> > > i cannot even begin to imagine trying to negate, what is there to do?
> >
> > Neg counterplans with a ban or tight restriction on info-tech.
> > Aff now links to all the DAs of info-tech generally, not just their "one
> > small way."
> >
> > Meredith Garmon / Fisk U.
> >
> >
> Perm-- Ban all infotech except for my plan. Now you have to link to my
> case again. How silly.
>
> Greg Achten
>
off perm--
1. no way to dilineate plan from rest of infotech, ie info tech is
necessary as a base for plan
2. not a logical perm, what is the reasoning behind it? In other words,
why keep this one form of infotech
3. precedent set by case. If case is possible all others are by rules of
fairness, ie what is so special about this case?
4. cannot put plan in a vaccuum, this would be abusive to the neg because
it would limit the real world impacts.
5. ....
I could go on, but I have homework to do,
Jonathan Honiball
References:
Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page