Re: which rez to vote for... (fwd)

[Jason Nordwick <nordwick@uclink2.berkeley.edu>]

CP, CP, CP... I'm tired of having to run a CP every round just to stay in 
it. I'm tired of having to listen to everybody else run a CP, too. I'm 
tired of having the judge after the round suggest that i should have run 
a CP (and then listen to him give the aff an exorbitant amount of leeway 
and me none).  I would rather just standup in 2NR, go for case and a DA.

besides, i would still be hard presses to find a very good DA that isn't 
empiracally denied.

also, voting for the restrict export rez would allow for the same debate 
as the CP (which a neg will be required to do every round), still allow 
for an increase CP (or just go the SQ way, which will also be increase), 
and let the neg be free to go for a case/DA strategy.

later
jason


On Tue, 24 Oct 1995, Meredith Garmon wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Oct 1995, Jason Nordwick wrote:
> > ::RESOLVED:  That the United States federal government should increase
> > ::development of information technology within the United States.
> > 
> > aka... resolved that the US should do what it is already going to do.  
> > how am i supposed to run a DA on this topic. i can already invision each 
> > affirmative starting with OB I: the expansion of info-tech is inevitable, 
> > and we isolate one small way in which it will expand poorly and fix that.
> > i cannot even begin to imagine trying to negate, what is there to do?
> 
> 	Neg counterplans with a ban or tight restriction on info-tech.  
> Aff now links to all the DAs of info-tech generally, not just their "one 
> small way."
> 
> 	Meredith Garmon / Fisk U.
> 
>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: Pick 50 - adaptation answers
• Next by Date: Re: CEDA Points: The Root of All Evil
• Prev by thread: WSU GTA JOB
• Next by thread: Re: which rez to vote for... (fwd)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page