Re: T = voter

[BLechtreck@aol.com]

>>>>>>>>>>
Let me ask a return question: suppose that aff made arguments
similar to the "T is not a voter" arguments Klemz gives, but aff is
arguing (for much the same reasons) that they should be given expanded speech
time.
>>>>>>>>>>

I think this would be comparing apples to oranges. Not everyone operates
under a stock issues paradigm where T is a voter. You assume that everyone
considers T a voter, but many do not. Time constraints, on the other hand,
are pretty cut and dry. There is very little argument over what constitutes 8
minutes (although it is possible I guess).

Tournament invites tell us what the times will be for each of the speeches.
If it also said T was a voter (ie: it is no longer an ambiguous uncertainty),
you would have a proper comparison.

Peace,

Bob Lechtreck
Bakersfield College

---

Follow-Ups:

• Re: T = voter
• From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
• Re: T = voter
• From: Earl Croasmun <croasmun@luna.cas.usf.edu>

---

• Prev by Date: Tuna Only!!
• Next by Date: Re: T = voter
• Prev by thread: Re: T = voter
• Next by thread: Re: T = voter
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page