Re: SEE NO, HEAR NO, PERM NO EVIL

[Klemz Aaron <aak322s@nic.smsu.edu>]

On Mon, 10 Oct 1994, Jason Cruce Trice wrote:

> MONKEYS--AN ENDANGERED SPECIES IN CEDA THEORY

Not Yet.
 
> 1.  TEXTUAL COMBINATIONS--DEFINITIONALLY, PERMS ARE COMBINATIONS OF THE PLAN
> (ALL OF IT) AND ANY OR ALL OF THE COUNTERPLAN.  NO ADDITIONS TO THE TEXTS ARE
> ALLOWED.  WE FEEL CONFIDENT EVEN KLEMZ WOULD AGREE WITH OUR INTERPRETATION OF
> TEXTUAL STANDARDS.

Incorrect again, laughingboy! See the earlier stuff on why this is too 
limiting.

> 3.  PERMS AREN'T ADVOCATED--THIS PREVENTS DEVEREAUX TYPE 2AR'S THAT ADVOCATE
> THE PERM WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE.

Ok.

I'm really glad you were able to add these wonderful points to the body 
of knowledge that CEDA has accumulated about counterplans. Perhaps you 
should write a theory book.

Aaron Klemz

---

References:

• SEE NO, HEAR NO, PERM NO EVIL
• From: "Jason Cruce Trice" <tricejas@student.msu.edu>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: THE SKY IS FALLING--OR ARE THOSE COCONUTS
• Next by Date: Re: Monkey's Have feelings too!!!
• Prev by thread: SEE NO, HEAR NO, PERM NO EVIL
• Next by thread: GOT THE MONKEY BY THE TAIL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page