bear and kritiks....

[00jegosnell@bsuvc.bsu.edu]

Bear,
	if you aren't in disagreement with my opposition to pre-resolutional
language critiques, then why are you posting against me at all.  I think the 
post you are looking for in reference to post-resolutional kritiks and their 
theoretical ligitamacy was covered by Kelly Young in his "rollin down the 
critique highway..." post.  i guess  there has been a lot of confusion in terms
of the way kelly and i chose to divide our ground.  The reason why there have 
been no theoretical opposition to kritiks comming from me is that kelly and i
decided that he would deal with the post-resolutional kritik theory and i would
deal with pre-resolutional language kritik "application."  i think that you are
agreeing with me in terms of what i'm arguing in this area.  i guess i just 
don't understand why you bothered to respond to my original post at all.  
especially since we seem to agree that the application of pre-resolutional 
language kritiks have no theoretical ligitamacy.  my post was not designed for
the in-depth theory discussion at a high level; it was designed to seek some
sort of theoretical justification for the application of these pre-resolutional
type kritiks.  

	i think that if you want to respond to my disagreements with the kritik
theory you're advocating then i would welcome some constructive discource (i
think we can both agree there is nothing constructive in the current discource.) 
as i said before my theoretical opposition is in the post "rollin down the 
critique highway.." and i welcome your responce.

Eric Gosnell
Ball State Debate

---

• Prev by Date: GRADUATE ASSISTANTSHIP OPPORTUNITY
• Next by Date: Oregon Results
• Prev by thread: GRADUATE ASSISTANTSHIP OPPORTUNITY
• Next by thread: Oregon Results
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page