[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page
Re: SPEED
On Sun, 21 Nov 1993, Todd D. Wachtel wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 21 Nov 1993, Maxwell D. Schnurer wrote:
> > Here is where I agreewith Dave. I think that evidence is
> > becoming overused. In my two and ahalf years in this erotic debate world,
> > I have found lots of things. One of which is that there is evidence to
> > say anything. So we should get rid of this whole evidence thing and just
> > use logic and reasons, and assertions!
> > Screw evidence! Lets debate
>
> I agree whole heartedly. We should eliminate speed and evidence and get
> back to the ol' fashioned rhetoric. This wide line between being a good
> speaker and a good debater is starting to get fustrating. We lose more
> novices who get intimidated away by practices that aren't really necessary
> for success. If all I was going to get out of an entire weekend was a
> trophy then I wouldn't see the need to debate. It is the process that is
> far more important. My ego is secure enough to recognize that material
> victories are fleeting.
>
> Learning is everything.
>
>
> - Todd
> Waxing Philosophical for a Sunday
>
>
>
Well, T-odd, I was only partially serious. Evidence is still
neccessary. But we should use more logical arguments and use analysis
too.
But I think we should have high-speed debate, little rhetoric, and
lots (fun) arguments. (and a few cards thrown in.)
maxwell
Follow-Ups:
- Re: SPEED
- From: "Todd D. Wachtel" <tdwachte@mailbox.syr.edu>
References:
- Re: SPEED
- From: "Todd D. Wachtel" <tdwachte@mailbox.syr.edu>
Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page