Re: Chud on speed correctness

[Michael David Fine <mf005a@uhura.cc.rochester.edu>]

Dear Adam,
Still no answer?  You last said that the INC could spew as long as the 2nc
took it upon themsleves to go slow to "even things out".  I think Michael
FinFine's argument is  rather good.  If the 1nc spews the 2nc and 1nr become
pull this drop etc.  There might be some explaination but not much more for
fear of new 1ar answers.  I think that speed in all situtations except if
the judge would prefer not to hear it is fine.  However if your going to
argue that speed allows for education etc. please justify yourself.
				From the frozen tundra of Rochester,
				Alex Helderman


In terms of the ad hom attacks.  I think Michael would agree, as we already
have agreed upon, are bad and should not be used in order to add power to
arguements, do you think that they do?  I don't know if we should lighten up
on an issue that we feel strongly about.  If someone told you to lighten up,
that sexist language was okay what would you say?

---

References:

• re: Chud on speed correctness
• From: "Adam M. Chud" <AC0683A@american.edu>

---

• Prev by Date: RE: Todd's response to that TRISH CHICK
• Next by Date: Re: Citeable -"public domain"
• Prev by thread: re: Chud on speed correctness
• Next by thread: Re: Chud on speed correctness
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page