RE: Anti-Counterplans

[Chris Smith <cdsmith@brain.uccs.edu>]

The anti-counter differs from the perm in that it isn't plan + all/part of 
cp, which would test competition of cp, but rather plan + competitive 
option to cp, which tests the net benefit of the cp.

Chris Smith
Woodland Park HS Debate

"Love is apparently killed by time, only because it transcends time; and 
its spiritual and infinite essence cannot be contained with the limitations 
of a material and finite world."
	- Caroline Spurgeon, on Shakespeare's philosophy of love

-----Original Message-----
From:	Elisia L Cohen [SMTP:elcohe01@homer.louisville.edu]
Sent:	Sunday, May 18, 1997 11:14 PM
To:	Issues concerning CEDA Debate
Subject:	Re: Anti-Counterplans

How can it be mutually INCLUSIVE of the affirmative plan without being
plan+ all/part of the CP-- a permutation.   Which, in my mind can be a
test of competitiveness that doesn't have to be 'advocated' by the
negative?

---

• Prev by Date: RE: The Farce that rolled
• Next by Date: SE Asia...and stuff and things
• Prev by thread: Re: Anti-Counterplans
• Next by thread: anticounterplans
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page