Re: The Farce that rolled

[joeb@media-net.net (Boyle, Joseph)]

There's only one reason I'd want a CR topic, so I could use every
argument about how debating CR will 'empower' the debaters and impact
the 'real world' to give me better links to Normativity.  

I bet Doug Roubidoux will vote for CR for just that reason... 

Joey Boyle
Assistant Coach
Fort Hays State University


Terry West wrote:
> 
> Josh is absolutely right in his post below.  As far as I can tell,
> every blooming pro-CR topic poster has essentially the same political
> view toward the topic:  affirmation of this topic will "enable" us
> somehow to have a "real world" impact on discrimination.  While I
> agree with that political view (that we should end discrimination),
> I'd sure hate to coach or debate negative on it.
> 
> Terry West
> Southern Utah
>

---

Follow-Ups:

• Re: The Farce that rolled
• From: Sean Upton <Sean.Upton@m.cc.utah.edu>

References:

• Re: The Farce that rolled
• From: "Terry West" <WEST@CENTRUM.CN.SUU.EDU>

---

• Prev by Date: RE:medina,dallas,aa
• Next by Date: Jazz: One slam dunk, three to go
• Prev by thread: Re: The Farce that rolled
• Next by thread: Re: The Farce that rolled
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page