Southworth and Tuna

[Josh <IFJXH@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU>]

I am glad to hear that someone is finally raising the ante calling for
limited topics.

While the my topic area is good discussion goes on and on about Civil Rights
ONLY Slusher has even dained to make reference to my challenge for the CR
topic......I will try again....

1. Topics should meet the following conditions
-action or verbin the resolution should be both limiting and field
    contextual (word used in the literature to sedcribe action taken in
    relation to civil rights).
-Direction and ground division on the topic should be precisely predictable.
2. I challenge supporters of the other topics (aside from treaties) to meet
   these conditions.
3. I challenge the community to look further than self-interest to recognize
   that the topic area SHOULD BE A SECONDARY CONCERN.....Your first concern
   should be predictable and limited ground division represented in the
   topic you vote for......PLEASE DO NOT JUST VOTE FOR A TOPIC AREA B/C
   YOU LIKE THE HARM AREA!!!!! If you really want to help novices, small
   programs etc......make the debate research predictable!!!!!
4. I support treaties precisely because treaties limits the action taken
   precisely.........I would support other topic ideas if they were proven
   to be limiting and predictable....Josh

Joshua B. Hoe


e-mail:IFJXH@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU
all info will be changing soon.

---

• Prev by Date: MIKE DAVIS OF SYRACUSE ONLY
• Next by Date: Yuri and Glen
• Prev by thread: MIKE DAVIS OF SYRACUSE ONLY
• Next by thread: RE: Southworth and Tuna
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page