[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page
Re: isaac & advoacy
Throwing my two cents in again. Sure, a good affirmative will never be
able to "force" a good negative into defending racism good. However, a
good affirmative will pick a case that the negative will be forced into
running bad generics, a counterplan with mediocre solvency, or repugnant
case arguments. Certainly this topics ground isn't black and white and
there are multitudes of options we do not know about. I throw in my
support for actual resolution discussions. The foreign policy
discussions may be tedious for the CR people, but they don't have to read
the posts. I believe the dead horse has been beaten and the CR's are
starting to get agitated. The foreign policy discussions may prove
Slusher and Stannard's impressions that CR is far more interesting.
Maybe Slusher will bust out and author a resolution based on all the
research he has already done for CR.
Its time for round two, besides I am tired of hearing the same old
Houston is going to crush the world before they go to the nursing home
discussions. I doubt they get passed Seattle anyway.
Hot Nickety Trunk Monkey
Kelly
References:
Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page