denny's resteraunt

[Matt Stannard <mstannard@AC.CEU.EDU>]

	Grant:
	>>>
> So I encourage a discussion to take place among those favoring a
> foreign 
> policy topic in order to avoid splitting the vote.  This exchange
> should 
> take place soon before schools start to send in their ballots.
      >>>
Discussion is good no matter when it takes place, and now certainly
would be a good time to debate the benefits of a so-called foreign
versus a so-called domestic topic.

	>>>
>   You all 
> might also consider not assigning any votes to the civil rights topic.
> 
	>>>
I am calling unreserved bullshit on this suggestion.  If people on the
so-called foreign policy side want to sink that low then they might want
to muster up the decency to admit it so people in favor of civil rights
can contemplate about whether that forces OUR hands...

Suggestions like this give lie to the claim that much of the opposition
to the civil rights topic is "flamed" and accused of being "political."
Who is being political now?
 
	>>>
> I simply concur with the well 
> explained posts that have described the lack of negative ground on the
> 
> civil rights topic.    
	>>>
Which ones?

matt stannard

---

Follow-Ups:

• My Pals: Matt, Slusher, And Tune
• From: Grant A Denny <gad0326@ksu.edu>

---

• Prev by Date: topic area vs. harm area
• Next by Date: WHEN do we do ANYTHING?!?! (was: Marcellus Wallace.)
• Prev by thread: topic area vs. harm area
• Next by thread: My Pals: Matt, Slusher, And Tune
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page