[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page
Re: Billy's grammar confusion re: "pimping"
- To: "Maxwell D. Schnorer" <schnomd5@wfu.edu>
- Subject: Re: Billy's grammar confusion re: "pimping"
- From: ross smith <smithr@wfu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 10:47:13 -0400 (EDT)
Pimp is no way comparable to "gyp" (derived from Gypsy) or "jew"
(obviously derived), or "nigger". Pimp offends no group except pimps,
who, in my opinion should be verbally degraded.
But when you call someone a pimp who is not a pimp, that is a mean
insult, nasty.
Now "pimping" evidence should mean, to keep things straight, selling
evidence and getting benefit from it that is not rightfully yours. But,
as used in this context, to pimp evidence is to degrade it through verbal
means, which does retain some of the meaning of pimp in that a pimp
degrades women by verbal means (as well as by commercial and physical and
other means).
We must watch our language, but we don't need to worry about offending
that opressed minority known aqs pimps.
Ross Smith
Wake Forest University Debate
910-759-5268
Box 7324 Reynolda Station
Winston-Salem, NC 27109
Follow-Ups:
Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page