[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page

Re: Here we go again

To: <ceda-l@cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: Here we go again
From: yuri <YURI@siucvmb.siu.edu>
From: yurii find all this dialogue about not criticizing others until our own houseis in order o.k., but maybe program directors should think about the studentsfirst, instead of their own impressions of what debate should be. seems to methat slow persuasive debate happens in CEDA. i spend a few years at regionaltournaments in texas and louisiana and i promise it was all about persuasion.the amount of learning is not the same. i speak from experience.
Date: Mon, 20 May 96 13:01:48 CST
Comments: Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2X

 and i have found many do it for their own sense of posterity in the activity,
 rather than what the students want, or what the student would benefit more
  from. i don't know all the neda people. and don't take this as a sweeping
 indictment. but if we see something we feel is "not as beneficial" for the
 students, then we should talk about it.
                                            thought from car-bond-o-lay
                                                      yuri

Prev by Date: searching for email addresses?
Next by Date: Re; Yuri & Here we Go Again
Prev by thread: Re: Here we go again
Next by thread: ceda roots/history
Index(es):

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page