Re: Easter Sunday?

[Karen H Brennan <sac19389@saclink.csus.edu>]

	I still don't understand how we can have more or less 
discrimination. This is my point. Even if we exam instances of 
discrimination, we are looking at numbers. What offends me is the idea 
that there is such a thing as less discrimination. Anytime anyone is 
discriminated against it should be examined and we should make any 
attempt we can to avoid it. In several previous posts on this topic, 
people have explained instances of discrimination in CEDA debate. Noone 
should say this discrimination was worse than that discrimination.
	I think that it really sucks that people are not going to attend 
CEDA nats because it falls on Easter. I also think that it sucks that 
many of us who are attending will miss spending the holiday with our 
families. The only point that I was trying to make is with the wording of 
the post-"less dicrimination is better than more." I think that this sort 
of justification is dangerous and wrong, because there is no way to weigh 
dicrimination. That is the way I read the line. I don't think that it is 
wrong for me to caution this sort of reasoning. I'm sorry if my sarcastic 
tone got in the way. I stand by what I say. There is no more or less when it 
comes to discrimination.

karen 
sac st

---

References:

• Re: Easter Sunday?
• From: "Lisa K. Heller" <lheller@richmond.edu>

---

• Prev by Date: The Easter Issue
• Next by Date: Womyn affirmative
• Prev by thread: Re: Easter Sunday?
• Next by thread: Gator Thanks
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page