Perming a Kritik(ing)

[David Rhaesa <race@midusa.net>]

I am still confused about this notion of "perming" a kritik.  Perhaps it 
is because of baggage I associate with the notion of permutations that I 
have this confusion.

The philosophical underpinnings of the WAY of thinking from which 
kritiking assumptions arise does not advocate an alternative.  In fact, 
the notion of demanding advocacy of an alternative is precisely the type 
of calculative thinking that Heidegger, Marcuse, and CLS "trashers" 
would reject most vehemently.

In essence, any time the affirmative attempts to "perm a kritik" they 
are making an independent link to most kritiks since the underlying 
assumptions of these WAYS of thought are anti-thetical to such notions 
of advocacy or alternatives.

dbr

---

Follow-Ups:

• Re: Perming a Kritik(ing)
• From: ross12@MARSHALL.EDU

---

• Prev by Date: Mutual Preference
• Next by Date: TSU Entries, Mon at 5:00
• Prev by thread: Mutual Preference
• Next by thread: Re: Perming a Kritik(ing)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page