Monte's reply to TD

[MStev11397@aol.com]

I am not sure where or how I fit into all the crap that td has been talking
but my name is in the subject line and I feel like that means I should
respond.  

I do not have a lot to say to TD.  He can think what he wants.  I even would
defend his right to say what he wants.  However, I do not believe he is
correct about the ethics of Linda Collier or the UMKC debate Forum.

I have been fortunate enough over the past 3 years to compete for the best
program in the country.  While at UMKC we have had many unfortunate
experiences.  However, the one constant we have had is the support of Linda.
 I will sware in court that I have never witnessed, heard of, or even thought
about inappropriate actions with regard to recruiting or competing committed
by Linda.  She is honest and fair.  In fact, she is arguably overly cautious.
To accuse her of anything is wrong.  

As a side note, I did explain before that I was just pulling Menzies' leg
peace,
Monte

---

• Prev by Date: RE: a good week for TD (my $.02)
• Next by Date: RE: a good week for TD (my $.02)
• Prev by thread: RE: a good week for TD (my $.02)
• Next by thread: Eligibility Rules
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page