[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page

Re: Researched topic wordings

To: Multiple recipients of list NDT-L <NDT-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
Subject: Re: Researched topic wordings
From: Sean Upton <Sean.Upton@m.cc.utah.edu>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 10:50:39 -0600 (MDT)


I agree with Doyle Srader and Steve Mancuso.  Let's not get ourselves into
a situation where we are stuck with a resolution that isn't going to
either get us at the heart of the debate about Southeast Asia or that is
too non-sequitur to the literature.  My suggestion (and the stuff I'm
researching now) is to look through government documents as well as the
excellent and thorough bibliography that Stacey and Dick put together in the 
topic paper. 

Additionally, I think the security/military/CBM angle (security 
assistance) is not going to be that fruitful of a category in this 
particular region; additionally, I think that Laura's post provides 
pretty good reasons to NOT debate a military topic.

Right now, I think that development assistance looks pretty fruitful, but 
I could be wrong.  I'll let y'all know in a week or two after I've dived 
into GDOC research to see what the policy makers in the field have to say.

Sean Upton
Utah Debate

Prev by Date: Researched topic wordings
Next by Date: Even quicker
Prev by thread: Researched topic wordings
Next by thread: Even quicker
Index(es):

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page