A simple reminder :

[Josh <IFJXH@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU>]

O.K.  I do not want to ruffle too many feathers, but, if those that read
any of my predictability posts (most importantly the topic bitterness post)
would join with me in encouraging the discussion on the L and the topic
committee in its deliberations to move toward limiting the action in the
resolution to a set of actualand tangible possibilities.  If the topic
reads Resolved: that the USFG should substantially change its foreign policy
towards one or more of the following SEAsian nations.....it will be a LONG
year.  Substantial change means nothing.  Foreign policy only barely means
something..... The United States has millions of policies that relate to
each of these countries.  Like I said before.....Multiply the number of
possible cases times the number of possible plans times the number of
possible advantages......hundreds of cases......I will do a more substantive
post later...JOsh

Joshua B. Hoe


e-mail:IFJXH@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU
all info will be changing soon.

---

Follow-Ups:

• Re: A simple reminder :
• From: "Jason L. Jarvis" <jarvijl5@wfu.edu>

---

• Prev by Date: No Subject
• Next by Date: Why predictability?
• Prev by thread: No Subject
• Next by thread: Re: A simple reminder :
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page