FW: The topic, I've got it...

[Scott Luchetti <luchettis@urvax.urich.edu>]

----------
From:  Scott Luchetti[SMTP:luchettis@urvax.urich.edu]
Sent:  Wednesday, June 19, 1996 11:28 PM
To:  'JOSEPH H BOYLE'
Subject:  RE: The topic, I've got it...
Importance:  High



----------

Resolved: That (a non-patriarchal) United States federal government 
should (non-normatively) implement a policy to reduce the net 
production of environmental pollutants in the United States (and the 
negative team can not run ice, warmimg, biz con, israel, china, 
russia, ethic, movements, anarchy, socialism, marxist feminism, 
environmental racism, nimby, or more than 1 T violation).

>Ok, J on "(and the negative team can not run ice, warmimg, biz con, israel, china, 
>russia, ethic, movements, anarchy, socialism, marxist feminism, environmental racism, >nimby, or more than 1 T violation).", with the following violation:
>
>Aff does not justify excluding any or all of these, and therefore they should lose or sever >this part of the res.
>
>Then I do one of the following:
>
>When they sever support for the above mentioned part of the res, I run T on that part of the >res, and boil down to a big messy theoretical kritik, that my partner probably loses track of >in the 2NR (if I don't lose track in the 1NR first)
	>
>With that part of the res severed, I run an anarchaic env. Movements position, with environ >racism, warming, and socialism impact scenarios, probably boil down to a hidden >independant voter on the J.
>
>
>Oh wait, or I could just take the easy way out: look at the wording: "the neg may NOT run..."  >As the negative, I must negate the resolution, and not not run, or run (double negative = >proof positive (Butler, Clue)) - In other words, I Must run these positions, so refer to the >above number 2, and again, I'll probably boil down to the hidden voter on J
>
>
>Scott
>

I think this topic fairly divides ground while staving off excessive 
backfile wars as well as a multitude of overlimiting T violations.  
We can even add another set of parentheses which include specific 
judges names and what can't be run in front of them.  Then we can 
please all of the people all of the time.

Joe

---

• Prev by Date: Reply to Klein re topic
• Next by Date: re: meany and topic ground
• Prev by thread: Reply to Klein re topic
• Next by thread: re: meany and topic ground
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page