Re: LINK VS. IMPACT

[David Ross Genco <dgenco@jove.acs.unt.edu>]

> 	If I'm affirmative and have nearly 100% probability of a link to 
> a small impact (let's say a conventional war between two South American 
> countries) and the negative has a very weak link or perhaps a very 
> generic link to a large impact (let's say an unconvetional war which 
> somehow includes every nuclear have in the world), with just these two 
> issues in the round, who should win?
> 	Of course I would like broader discussion, so please tell me what 
> you think and feel free to use different contexts and link/impact 
> factors like specific vs. systemic arguments.

It depends, am I affirmative?

******************
*    Dave Genco  *
*  University of *
*   North Texas  *
******************

---

• Prev by Date: CEDA National Executive Council Meeting
• Next by Date: Links, impacts, and David Genco
• Prev by thread: CEDA National Executive Council Meeting
• Next by thread: Links, impacts, and David Genco
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page