Re: Problem Area

[DSRADER@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU]

I hope Martin doesn't mind me sharing our little exchange.
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
On Sat, 25 Jun 1994 01:38:36 -0600 (CST) you said:
>
>NO NO NO. NO SPORTS. It has nothing to do with us being wimps. Sports
>is a waste and boring as HELL. A man with a black belt in english can
>surely do better then sports.
>
Have you ever debated a sports topic before?

[pause while you shake your head]

Then how do you KNOW it would be boring? Give it a chance! This subject
area has as many facets as any other. Baylor ran an affirmative dealing
with sports last year and you would be surprised at the impacts we
claimed. I won't tell you, though, because a friend of mine might want
to run it if you folks took the gutsy move of trying something different
and actually choosing the sports topic.

Love Child
H: (706) 548-6041
W: (706) 542-3238

---

• Prev by Date: No Subject
• Next by Date: The theory ev debate crystallizes
• Prev by thread: Re: Problem Area
• Next by thread: Topic Selection Procedure
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page