[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page
Re: Views on the Topic Selection Process
On Fri, 12 Jul 1996, CORI DAUBER wrote:
> I dont think the committee's work has been "very good" I think it has
> been spectacular -- the raw stamina involved in going through all the
> posts combined with the patience and grace you all have shown to those of
> us who butted in at various stages has been a testament to the very
> finest service that can be offered to either community, if you want to
> see as still distinct in some way.
>
> I think the concern with procedure was an argument going in the opposite
> direction -- that is, the process has been so good, the work product so
> good, it would be a shame to stop now, one word change away from really
> great, just because one post happened to have the word "final" on it. I
> guess what we're really asking the committee is to reallyd o what you've
> been doing all along -- one last time.
>
Ede Warner Jr., Director of Debate
Strickler 308E, Department of Communication
University of Louisville
Louisville, KY 40292
1-502-852-7126 (office); 1-502-634-0306 (home)
fax: 1-502-852-8166
References:
Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page