Re: 1996-97 CEDA Topic

[Bob Lechtreck <db8coach@lightspeed.net>]

>>>>>>>>>>
I agree with the idea of debating a policy topic.  However, I think we take
a big risk when we attempt to form a coalition only voting for one topic.
If there is a clear consensus as to a favorite topic then fine, everybody
vote for it.  However, if we also rank the other policy topics they will at
least get some weight and we increase the chances of getting SOME policy
topic. 
>>>>>>>>>>

This is how mediocre topics get chosen. Some rank a topic #1 and others rank
it not at all. That means that the topic that gets consistent 3's from
everyone ends up winning.

No, I think that those who reccomended we vote as a coalition are correct. I
also support topic #1.

---

• Prev by Date: Looking for some people
• Next by Date: Tuna--topic #5 clarification
• Prev by thread: Re: 1996-97 CEDA Topic
• Next by thread: Re: 1996-97 CEDA Topic
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page