Re: Re: Case Lists

["Michael W. Bryant" <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>]

> Reply-to:      ceda-l@cornell.edu
> From:          Love Child <DSRADER@uga.cc.uga.edu>
> To:            Multiple recipients of list <ceda-l@cornell.edu>
> Subject:       Re:  Re: Case Lists
> Date:          Sun, 23 Jan 1994 15:02:58 -0500

> And refusal to listen to criticism, labelling it "hierarchical"
> (congratulations!), guarantees stagnation. There are different ways of
> doing things in different branches of the activity. There are problems
> in each branch of the activity. You, I, and everyone else knows this.
> Pointing out the practices of one group and discussing their potential
> application to the problems of another is not immoral, unethica, unfair,
> unjust, or whatever other labels accompany the h-word. It's another
> h-word: helpful.
>
> Love Child
> H: (706) 548-6041
> W: (706) 542-3238
>
Well, Doyle, of course. So I promise not to go ballistic if we can
talk about this in a manner that doesn't employ adjectives such as
counterproductive, bad, and crap in a holistic assessment of the
"other" side of debate, OK? Yes, maybe you are insulting institutions
instead of people, but the people in CEDA are humans too. CEDA
coaches are your professional colleagues and I'll still resist
efforts to label the entire organization as "counterproductive." Does
this still seem like an outlandish request? Am I really insulting you
in making such a request?

Bear

---

• Prev by Date: Pre-round disclosure
• Next by Date: No Subject
• Prev by thread: Re: Re: Case Lists
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Case lists
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page