A Note from "the power that isn't"...

[James Michael Dumas <jmd9@crux5.cit.cornell.edu>]

Hi Y'all,

Hope everyone is doing well.

Ihaven't had time to do anything but skim the messages from the last week 
(we at Cornell are still on the road ... and no one has been killed yet 
amazingly enough -- four weeks without going home might be too long).  
BUT, I wanted to underline something that Tuna mentioned -- I/we have/had 
no intention of making a CEDA-L policy decision about case lists.  I 
probablly would lean toward complete disclosure, although I see several 
potential problems with it.  My original suggestion to limit the case 
lists to not including who was running what was merely an attempt to 
introduce information about what was being run without offending people 
from regions where case information is not freely exchanged.  I think 
that Tom Murphy's suggestion for some type of "list concensus" seems like 
a good solution to this issue. Good luck and chat soon.

--Jamey

---

• Prev by Date: case lists and ceda-l
• Next by Date: Re: CEDA-L digest 83 and case list vote
• Prev by thread: case lists and ceda-l
• Next by thread: Re: CEDA-L digest 83 and case list vote
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page