[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page
Re: our water, our bodies, our subject lines
On Wed, 1 Feb 1995 jhboyle@acs.harding.edu wrote:
>
> In response to Mike Berman:
>
> Maybe I miscommunicated. In order to get a link back to the resolution you
> either have to define people as an ocean resource (through creative use
> of the word resource) or by identifying the relationship between people and
> oceans as a resource (again, creative word usage, as Chico does).
CORRECTION: This resolution looks to Earth's ocean resources. Where is
the resource? The Earth. Who owns the resource? The Earth. Ocean is a
limiter of TYPE of resource, not source or possessor.
Simply put, the Earth is all of us, living and non-living. The resource
is a relationship. We specifically turn to the relationship with the
ocean since it is the worst off (terrestrial or aviary ecosystems for
some reason are more *real* or *connected*.) Even many deep ecologists
seem to have trouble with the idea of including the ocean and its
inhabitants in their philosophies (see Langdon Winner on Scandanavian
whaling and ecologists.)
I do not find this "creative word useage." To one who starts from a
biocentric view or from a Heideggerean/Deep-Ecological view it may be
*more* intuitive than the concept that the Earth's ocean resources are
sub-sea-bed disposal areas or edible fish stocks. All depends on what
angle ya' see it from.
-/-Pat Gehrke
-/-CSU CHICO
Follow-Ups:
References:
Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page