CEDA-L Archive List (by Thread)
Last updated: Tuesday July 15, 1997
607 messages
Search This Archive
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page
- FW: Message on Internet re: LEXIS-NEXIS Educational Program,
Johnson, Carol S.
- Re: Rogers' Rebuttal,
Meredith Garmon
- Re: Hypo.Counterplan Scenario,
Meredith Garmon
- Re: non-Mexico Mexico,
Michael Bryant
- Re: Over"Bear"ing,
Meredith Garmon
- Re: Johnson and Mexico,
Matthew Collins Johnson
- SIU grad schoolJust a reminder to those who requested information about the two graduate,
DEBATE
- Flat Preference,
Kenneth Broda-Bahm
- MPJ and Accountability,
Steve Woods
- MPJ?,
STUMASSEYJB
- Coaches Poll 12-1-95,
Pacedebate
- MPJ does not hurt the process of judge adaptation,
Alfred C. Snider
- New on Debate Central 12-95,
DebateCent
- traditional t,
Debateone
- The LSAT & the CEDA-L,
Matthew K. Roskoski
- Re: LSAT & CEDA-L,
Vikas N Shah
- Trolling and catching a Tuna on apda-l On Sat, 2 Dec 1995, Meridith Garmon wrote:,
RICK MILLER
- Flowing evidence....,
Pacedebate
- FWD>Christmass Cheer for E-Mail Addicts,
William Loges
- Re: Trolling and catching a Tuna on apda-l,
DRTUNA
- Rogers' response,
Jack Rogers
- Flaming Dreams,
Stefan Andre Bauschard
- LSAT TRICK QUESTION,
Carson Brackney
- Reading Evidence,
Carson Brackney
- A Tag-Flowing Hypothetical Question,
James M. Dumas
- flowing ev.....,
Pacedebate
- Dear Santa: Viva' Mexico,
RICK MILLER
- Flowing Evidence - Has the Emperor No Clothes?,
Alfred C. Snider
- Re:Garmon on "MPJ and Accountability",
Steve Woods
- Dear Santa :-),
Jason Cruce Trice
- Flaming Dreams -Reply,
MICHAEL BRYANT
- More on MTSU JOB -- Easier Application Process,
Russell T. Church
- Flowing ev,
WHITNEMR
- santa,
Geoffrey M Wyatt
- evidence and flowing,
Brian R McGee
- flowing ev - I've been converted.,
Pacedebate
- serious, controversial issues,
adam chud
- The grinch that stole the (-: person,
RICK MILLER
- Lsat and ceda-l,
Pacedebate
- Evidence,
Earl Croasmun
- Bob Dole,
MBRYANT
- the truth about "santa",
Geoffrey M Wyatt
- Mutual pref/Pick at least 20,
Pacedebate
- Santa Speaks!!,
Santa Claus
- No Subject,
Adam Chud
- Re: Mutual pref/Pick at least 20 Re: Yes, Wyatt, there is a "santa",
Jack Rogers Jack Rogers <Jack_Rogers%UT_TYLER@notes.worldcom.com>
- Directing Forensics Bibliography,
Steven Hunt
- The Border Skirmish Debate Tournament at Allegheny College The Border Skirmish Debate Tournament Allegheny College Meadville, PA January 27 & 28, 1996,
Daniel Joyce
- Schedule for C EDA Natioanls,
Steven Hunt
- flowing evidence etc.,
Gina Lane
CEDA Nationals,
Steven Hunt
Re: Regional Constraints (fwd),
Steven Hunt
Re: Yes, Wyatt, there is a "santa" -Reply,
Glen Strickland
STAM Journal,
Tom Preston
Response to Jack Rogers Re: Santa Claus,
Michael R. Dickman" Jack Rogers <Jack_Rogers%UT_TYLER@notes.worldcom.com>
Tags etc. (Fwd) How to Argue Effectively (fwd),
Josh Yuval Malchi <ymalchi@mailbox.syr.edu>
Re: subscribe CEDA-L,
Terry Noland
Re: Mutual pref/Pick at least 20 -Reply,
Jack Rogers
Re: Yes, Wyatt, there is a "santa",
Geoffrey M Wyatt
Mr. Hopper, tell us about evidence...,
Alfred C. Snider
Re: Santa Speaks!! On Tues, 05 Dec, Scott wrote (responding to "deer-roids")----,
RICK MILLER
Debaters as Judges,
Derek Shaffer
Re: Debaters as Judges,
Derek Lawrence Shaffer
Re: Debaters as Judges,
Derek Shaffer
Oxford and Mardi Gras ?'s,
Rebecca L Congo
Santa Claus,
Virginia
SANTA HELP!!!!!,
Carson Brackney
Christmas Spirit,
Bob Roberts
coaches poll comments,
Pacedebate
Re: Topicality--ten starting points for standards,
Michael Bryant
coaches poll comments (fwd),
william sheffield
synthesis,
rodger biles
Re: Regional Constraints,
Alfred C. Snider
re:student judges,
Terry West
student judges,
Valerie Regi Renegar
student judges,
Erica Grosjean
regional constraints,
Pacedebate
Re: Debaters as judges,
Carson Brackney
student judges -Reply,
Jared Phillips
students judging,
Pacedebate
Re: Regional Constraints -Reply,
Glen Strickland
A reply for Bear <Re: Debaters as Judges> -Reply,
Glen Strickland
Re: A reply for Bear <Re: Debaters as Judges>,
Michael Bryant
Student Judges,
WHITNEMR
What's New In Debater's Monthly,
benjamin r bates
Re: A reply for Bear <Re: Debaters as Judges> (fwd),
M. Benson
Re: Regional restraints with pick 20,
Alfred C. Snider
Santa's Annual Report,
tbarnes
FSU Coaching Assistants,
James Brey
Student Judges -Reply,
Jared Phillips
spring 1996 topic,
DAVID GRASSMICK
Nationals Dates,
lfarstveet
Debater judges with strikes,
Harris Martin C
Why bother with topic areas?,
Norah E. Dunbar
Students should judge... but why vote?,
Glenn Ellingson
Subscription,
Mitchell Scott A
re:student judges--Double Standard in Evidence,
jhobbs
Re: (Fwd) How to Argue Effectively (fwd),
Terry Noland
Evidence-Student Judge Double Standard,
Alfred C. Snider
Re: Why bother with topic ar,
Carson Brackney
Nick Burnett (others feel free to delete),
Eric L. Krug
email addresses,
Adam Chud
student judges and grosjean,
Adam Chud
re: student judges - evidence double standard,
jhobbs
Re: Why bother with topic a,
Carson Brackney
Re: spring 1996 topic -Reply,
Glen Strickland
NDT ALUMNI,
louden
Make your opinions known!,
Alyson Lynn Lewis
Update on GSL,
Rebecca Bjork
Western Tournament???,
Nicholas F Burnett
Research sources on the web,
luchettis
Immigration / 187 Evidence,
Pat
power rankings info needed,
Pacedebate
Re: Judge Intervention as Argument Teacher is Inevitable,
Terry West
Re: Mr. Hopper,
Terry West
theory ev.,
Meredith Garmon
theory evidence,
Brian R McGee
Peruvian Arguments,
TY ADAMS
partner needed,
Adam Chud
Re: Chiapas Info Source,
Carson Brackney
TOPIC,
Nicholas F Burnett
A message to "lurkers" and small schools,
Unitarian Universalist UN Office
equal burdens,
Unitarian Universalist UN Office
It is Mexico,
Alfred C. Snider
Spring 96 topic,
Gregory Alan Achten
TOPIC -Reply,
Glen Strickland
Why, of course!,
TY ADAMS
Will Baker and bad flowing by debaters...,
Pacedebate
Thinking about fiat?,
Kenneth Broda-Bahm
Re: Fiesta Results,
Josh
Re: Immigration / 187 Evide,
Carson Brackney
Re: New Tournament part 2,
Josh
NDT and Kentucky Just two quick requests. First, could someone please mail me the necessary NEW TOURNAMENT PART ONE PLEASE READ!,
tbarnes@CCTR.UMKC.EDU Josh
Tuna's Christmas Gift - the UCO Case List,
DRTUNA
Virtual Arsenals,
CTESKE
Debate in the Balkans? I think the idea of bringing the debate to the Balkans is a good one, but a I believe that USA CG (Clinton/ Gore) has gone to mediate (or judge) the I guess it is a round robin? I have seen several debate teams get upset I awoke this morning to see a picture on the front of "USA TODAY" showing I am sorry if I seem cynical, but it is hard to imagine bringing debate to a It is Mexico(in case you haven't figured that out!!!!!)el topico es mexico, para las personas que no conocen, muchos personasescriben.I think we got the freakin' picture~!!!! infor tech FWD: ALERT:INTERNET DAY OF PROTEST TUESDAY DECEMBER 12, 1995 (fwd),
tbarnes@CCTR.UMKC.EDU emslusher@CCTR.UMKC.EDU fstevens@CCTR.UMKC.EDU Matt Siemens
USC/ HOTEL & FLIGHT INFO (fwd),
Matthew Taylor
re:speed,
Michael Miroslav Korcok
Warning, warning-- head explosions!,
Natalie D. Yarwood
Speed,
haykengre
- Re: Speed,
Mike Dugaw
- Re: Speed,
Alfred C. Snider
- Re: Speed,
Mike Dugaw
- Re: Speed,
Alfred C. Snider
- Re: Speed,
BLechtreck
- Speed,
Matthew Taylor
- Speed,
David Muschell
- Re: Speed,
Mike Dugaw
- Re: Speed,
Alfred C. Snider
- Re: Speed,
baker
- RE: Speed,
batesbenj
- Re: Speed,
David Muschell
Re: ALERT:INTERNET DAY OF PROTEST TUESDAY DECEMBER 12, 1995 (fwd) Evidence Ethics Policy,
Miles452@aol.com Kenneth Broda-Bahm
Speed and flowing and Mike Korcok,
DRTUNA
Speed in the Game & Mr. Hayken,
DRTUNA
definitions,
Ddelano13
UMKC and virtual deterrence...,
Jason A. Nordwick
Re: FWD: ALERT:INTERNET DAY OF PROTEST TUESDAY DECEMBER 12, 1995 (fwd),
Jason A. Nordwick
Couple of Things,
Vikas N Shah
sorry umkc about the thread...,
Jason A. Nordwick
apology to pointer from umkc,
Jason A. Nordwick
Ken--re the CEDA Evidence Document,
Jim Hanson
The Debate Home Page,
luchettis
Re: Evidence Ethics,
bc70022
Lisa Heller of Richmond,
DRTUNA
Help me delete the right documents,
Alfred C. Snider
CEDA President Steven Hunt has established a committee to examine the area of access to electronic r,
Glen Strickland
**Re: Chiapas Sources,
Michael Bryant
Defending Korcok (resp. to Bear),
Pat
**RE: Defending Korcok (Response to Pat),
Michael Bryant
someone from syracuse,
ocallaghan kellie an
Share Room at USC,
Pat
Long Beach Tourny,
Matthew Taylor
**,
Carson Brackney
The Gingrinch who stole congress (fwd),
Russell T. Church
Cornell U. Tournament Invitation, Feb. 9-11,
forensics@cornell.edu
**RE: Defending Korcok (Response to Honiball),
Michael Bryant
Fwd: Re: Will Baker and bad flowing by debaters...,
Pacedebate
E-Mail Rating Codes,
Matthew K. Roskoski
Adam Chud & Debater for WJC and KSU,
Jason Cruce Trice
Seig Heil!!! FY,
Matthew K. Roskoski
Saluki hotelThe Comfort, the tournament hotel for the Saluki, is filling up. If you,
DEBATE
Arrogance,
Pacedebate
Chiapas-l list...,
Terry Noland
Re: Arroganceam rather disturbed by the tone and attitude you display in this post. IWhen I judge debate I always tell students what I prefer in the round.,
Mike Dugaw
Bear Begs for An End!,
Michael Bryant
Tournament?,
Josh
Arrogance!!,
Jason Cruce Trice
HEY SIU (others delete),
Scott Titsworth *** Northeast Missouri State
CEDA-L CASE LIST THE CEDA-L CASE LIST ====================,
James M. Dumas
defense of Korcok,
Jason Cruce Trice
Soros Foundation Debate Program I'd like to interrupt your discussions to tell you about an interesting debate program developing in Eastern Europe. My name is Katherine Johnson. I am working with the Soros Foundation on a project developing debate in Eastern and Central Europe, The Balkans and Central Asia. Some of you are already familiar with The Soros Foundation and have been assisting us with the project...Thank you! For those of you that are not familiar please let me take a moment to explain our program. In March 1994, The Soros Foundation invited 60 people from 18 countries throughout E.Europe to Budapest Hungary to learn about a new program that could be introduced into their schools. The participants, mostly high school teachers, came expecting to learn new teaching methods from an organization they had heard a lot about. What they received was an introduction to debate; an activity that was both challenging and intimidating to most of them. The training was run by two Hungarian women, one of which was a professor of Applied English Linguistics who had recently returned from a year in Australia where she learned about Debate. The other was a high school English teacher who assisted with lectures, research material etc. The initial training gave a brief, very general idea of debate, rhetoric, and its application in the classroom. Although not presenting a complete picture of debate, the initial training was very successful in sparking the interests. Before leaving Hungary, The Soros Foundation explained their offer for funding the debate program. The program would include funds for: 1. A Debate Center: which is an office/room which should be used by both the administration and the debaters as a meeting point. ie. a club location. 2. Subscriptions and Research material for the Center. 3. Office Equipment to be used at the Center. 4. Salaries for the teachers who develop this program at their schools. 5. All travel and accomodation for debaters relating to tournaments. 6. Salaries for three administrators for each country. Excited by the many opportunities offered to them through the debate program, many of the participants returned to their countries and began the program. They submitted budgets, hired people, found debate center locations and generally worked to develop the program in their countries. Within 10 months the program had grown faster than any other youth program in the Foundation. The budget doubled and the demand was growing. Debate was a hit in Eastern Europe! The problem was that the initial training had not prepared the Soros Foundation employees or the debaters for this type of growth. The quality of debate varied depending on how well the initial teachers understood the Budapest training. Rules varied from country to country as did the teaching methods. A more uniform program needed to be developed to meet the growing needs. I was hired to assist in developing this program. For the last six months I have been travelling throughout the region, assessing the program, training new teachers, and generally identifying each country's developmental needs which tended to vary. Two weeks ago I returned to the United States after two and a half years in Eastern Europe (it was wonderful to come home!) and am now beginning my work in developing teaching material for the European debate program. My goal is to develop: 1. Video tapes: A. Teachers. I envision an instructional tape for teachers which would involve classroom activities allowing the teacher to see how debate instruction is structured. ** It is important to note hear that the teaching style and in general the classroom environment in the former Soviet Union is very different than the United States. So often times, the most difficult concept for the teacher to grasp is "open discussion" during the lessons. B. Students. A tape showing a debate that at times pauses to point out mistakes or strong points of the debaters. Students are very interested in debate but is limited because of the lack of instruction. We need to develop a tape for the students to get more specific, advanced instruction. 2. Written Materials. One of the biggest barriers in getting the teachers to begin debate in their classroom is the lack of materials to offer them. Teachers in any country prefer to have textbooks and classroom exercises to use during their lessons...particularly when teaching something they only partially understand themselves. We are therefore working on introductory materials to offer them for approximately the first 10 weeks of debate instruction. 3. Audio to accompany the book, to assist in teaching persuasion, intonation etc. I am aware that similar material has been published in the United States. I have reviewed many books and tapes and in some cases have found them useful. The problem frankly is that the program in E. Europe is not as advanced and structurally is a bit different. It is a cross between L.D. and Policy as there is no plan but the topics tend to be similar to that of Policy..(ie. The government has an obligation to take care of its poor). The debate is three on three with two sets of cross examinations. The focus is much more on public speaking and persuasion skills which is, in my opinion, unfortunately not true in the more recent style of U.S. debate. The differences go on and on, not to mention the language problem that many of the U.S. materials pose to non native speakers. So there is my situation. In the next three to four months I will be working on developing materials specifically for the Soros Program. What I am looking for from anyone that is interested in helping are suggestions on effective books, videos etc. that might give me some ideas on how best to approach this project. I am also looking for imput from anyone with innovative ideas on developing this material. I feel certain that most of you have, through your own teaching, developed classroom exercises for debate instruction. I would love to hear from you! Please keep in mind, that the materials we develop will have to be completely self explanatory. We must assume that the user will be a tired, underpaid teacher with only a two day introductory course of debate and a lot of good intentions. If you have any questions, comments or ideas please write me at kjohnson@sorosny.org. Sincerely, Katherine Johnson P.S. I think the Mexico resolution is interesting but more importanly helpful in making students more aware of other countries. One of the most frustrating aspects of our culture is how uninformed we tend to be about other countries and cultures.,
kjohnson
Looking for cites,
stdtfd
Forensics TAships,
william sheffield
The Debate Home Page Survey,
luchettis
SB**!!- Bear is WRONG. On Mon, 11 Dec 1995, Bear, responding to J. Honiball, wrote:,
RICK MILLER
Arroganceam rather disturbed by the tone and attitude you display in this post. I,
Pacedebate
**, xx, jj, !!, zz, ui, fy, dm-top ten reasons Mexico sucks!,
emslusher
Lemoine vs. Snackbar,
emslusher
Hybrid Needed for Long Beach,
Michael Bryant
HELP (fwd) HELP,
Doyle Srader Dallas Perkins <dperkins@HUSC.HARVARD.EDU>
Lemoine v. Achten,
Susan J Stanfield
Re: Net Evidence (was: Chiapas Sources),
Glenn Ellingson
Pointer and Slusher,
Rebecca S Opsata
SPRING TOPICS umkc debate,
David M. Berube" mkking@CCTR.UMKC.EDU
I feel sorry for the rest of the UMKC squad,
Alfred C. Snider
Speed/MPJ,
WHITNEMR
Re: SB**!!- Bear is WRONG.,
Michael Bryant
Electronic and open forum evidence - a word from one committee,
Kenneth Broda-Bahm
Other Evidence issues,
Kenneth Broda-Bahm
Lemoine and Achten,
Andrea G. Looby
ARKANSAS TECH TOUR-,
ROBERT BOLEN 0458
Re: Arrogance Ok, things are becoming more clear to me. You seem to view debate I believe that debate is PRIMARILY an argumentation activity, but I did do what you suggested for many years. I heard the debate and You indicate that you would not force your position on my debaters, My goal in starting this line was to check and see if there was a,
Mike Dugaw
A clarification on my feeling sorry,
Alfred C. Snider
Forwarded mail....,
Terry Noland
re: New Tournament - Please read,
Josh
Pointer and Slusher's reply,
emslusher
POINTER AND SLUSHER'S APOLOGYALL THAT THIS IS A VERY SIMPLISTIC STATEMENT. UMKC HAS ALWAYS HAD A REPUTATIONFOR HARDWORKING DEBATERS AND AN EXCELLENT COACHING STAFF. BY ALLOWING POINTERAND SLUSHER TO DO THEIR GRANDSTANDING ON THE L AND ASSOCIATING THEMSELVES WITHCARDS? UNFORTUNATELY, NO ONE KNOWS THE ANSWER. PERHAPS IT IS FRUSTRATION WITH THE TOPIC, TOO MUCH ALCOHOL, OR LACK OF ANY COMMON SENSE OR COURTESY TO OURSOMEONE CAN GET THEM TO UNDERSTAND THAT SAYING "SORRY" TO COVER THEIR ASSES,,
jdotson
Korcok, Necrophilia, and Bozos,
Michael Bryant
The Boyle,
Richard L. Hathaway
pointer and slusher's reply,
hyaffe
Re: SPRING TOPICS,
Jonathan T Honiball
More on arrogance...,
Pacedebate
a bit of support I am writing, as one who has debated for UMKC this past semester, to add I think that some members of the UMKC squad are going a little too far in I do not think that there was any malicious intent on Pointer and I honestly beleive, from personal experience, that everyone has either I have offered to install a "keyboard breath-a-lizer" on their computers. Arrogance/speed,
tbarnes
out of context,
Pacedebate
UMKC, a Lame List, and Apologies,
D. Kirk Wylie
Ev from the Internet,
Matthew K. Roskoski
DOF and release time,
Michael Dreher
SPRING TOPIC,
David M. Berube
FINAL ON MEXICO,
David M. Berube
Re: out of context - Mazarr?,
Alfred C. Snider
Hopper's Critique of Me,
Michael Bryant
**!! Bear and Ethics (or lack of) On Wed, 13 Dec 1995, Bear replied to my post, in it he made some,
RICK MILLER
Re: **!! Bear and Ethics (or lack of),
Michael Bryant
Why Net Evidence is Great,
James M. Dumas
Internet Ev and Electronic Eaves-Dropping,
Matthew K. Roskoski
Blinders and Balkanization (net evidence),
James M. Dumas
Dumas and net evidence....,
Pacedebate
out of context...,
Pacedebate
Mazarr and context(sorry about the stuff at the top),
Postmaster@CCTR.UMKC.EDU
Topic Selection Proposals,
Alfred C. Snider
Tournaments-IE and Public Debate,
BCS2000
Net Ev, A Question of DegreeHello, Randi here again. Having just demonstrated that it is indeed,
Matthew K. Roskoski
Why The Solution to Net Evidence Needs to be In round,
James M. Dumas
Slusher etc.,
Josh
An apology,
Terry Noland
Backchannel Warning,
Michael Bryant
Tuna's topic proposal,
Pacedebate
.,
Ender
Request: Mail Bomb Bear,
Stefan Andre Bauschard
Mr. Hopper's Critique of Me,
John Fritch
Re: Nordstrom, Korcok, Necrophilia, and Bozos,
Matthew K. Roskoski
Re: Cases and researching,
David Hotchkin
Summons to appear in court,
Matthew K. Roskoski
glowing aliens & tequila,
Stephen Renaud Stricker
nonflow and speed,
Michael Miroslav Korcok
Spring Topic & Berube,
Jason Cruce Trice
David & Spring Topic,
Jason Cruce Trice
guilty, guilty, guilty,
Michael Miroslav Korcok
Garmon and speed,
Michael Miroslav Korcok
**Bear: Illogical and still wrong,
RICK MILLER
MPJ in Japan,
Meredith Garmon
**Bear, King o' the straw person fallacy,
RICK MILLER
If she weighs the same as a duck, she made a new argument,
Matthew K. Roskoski
Nonflow & Speed,
WHITNEMR
Lemoine vs. Snackbar -Reply,
Glen Strickland
Re: Lemoine and Achten -Reply,
Glen Strickland
CASE LIST UPDATE PROPOSAL,
James Michael Dumas
WJC debate tourney, Jan 4-6,
Gina Lane
SPRING TOPICS, Berube, Larson, New Procedure,
Alfred C. Snider
christmas email,
Glen1
sign-up,
Eric Preston Fletcher
CEDA-L Archives,
James Michael Dumas
Chip&THe BOss & Agriculture,
Jason Cruce Trice
'bye,
Meredith Garmon
Miami,
Vikas N Shah
Re: NDT eligibility and Bear,
Alfred C. Snider
CEDA-L Archives May Hurt You - Caution CEDA-L Archives May Hurt You - Caution,
Alfred C. Snider
need to talk to someone from cornell,
nstal6435
flamefreeweek,
Debateone
I need to talk to certain people,
Gregory Alan Achten
Skip Eno only (or others from UTSA),
Gregory Alan Achten
Long Beach,
Matthew Taylor
apology Where is Waldo ... er ... Todd Graham? (humor),
Alfred C. Snider
new arguments and fairness,
Pacedebate
posts and consequences,
Michael Miroslav Korcok
Re: NDT Eligibilty and Bear,
Michael Bryant
Whitman Tournament,
Jim Hanson
Re: flamefreeweek (You're trying to trick us... It won't work.),
Matthew K. Roskoski
NCAA,
Ian T Klinkhamer
"We must chill messages which chill messages",
Alfred C. Snider
Tuna the censor,
Michael Miroslav Korcok
Greg Achten,
Jason Cruce Trice
Tim: On Crack? (It's a question and therefore not actionable.),
Matthew K. Roskoski
Pointer or Slusher,
John Sullivan
out of contextWhy bother with evidence if it is just a doesn't represent that author's view.,
Pacedebate
Help! If You Care To.,
tjewell
K-State high yield wheat cites MSU again,
nslow4912
re:new tournament part three,
Josh
MPJ Data,
Aaron R Klemz
Orange Invitational,
Michael K. Davis
Syracuse Round Robin,
Michael K. Davis
Grad Assistant,
Michael K. Davis
Melissa Wade,
Roy H. Eno
CEDA Home Page,
Alfred C. Snider
CEDA Call for Papers and Studies,
DRTUNA
ADI,
Josh
Oceans card cite,
Doyle Srader
Missing a name,
Jasmine Catherine Abdel-Khalik
Pt Loma's Sunset Cliffs' Classic,
SkipRutledge
Re: Santa Claus (not really, so calm down),
zab
Let's open the p20 can of worms again,
zab
Long Beach Entries,
Matthew Taylor
Cites amd stuff,
JOSEPH H BOYLE
;-) Dust, Tagging, Bfield, Wattenberg ;-) bakersfield,
Pat Gehrke Josh <IFJXH@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU>
Re: bakersfield,
peterson
Watterburg et al,
JOSEPH H BOYLE
Wm. Jewell tourney...,
Jason Griffith
One last try: Miami,
Vikas N Shah
Should/Would arguments,
JOSEPH H BOYLE
Re: Jewell,
ross12
Give Mexico 10,000 tickets,
JOSEPH H BOYLE
Queens College CEDA Tournament,
WB2000
the chiefs lose??? never!!!,
Jason Griffith
MARSHALL AT WILLIAM JEWELL,
jdotson
Wm Jewell entries,
Gina Lane
Magic at Jewell?,
ross12
cal swing,
DAVID ROMANELLI
marshall and his wacky idea that the chiefs suckSeahawks). He did it to them again last week on an 89-yard return on a punt.,
jdotson
Re: Regarding disclosure,
Terry West
CEDA-L digest 772,
Gina Lane
Reply to Tuna re regarding disclosure,
JKM1993
Reply to West re regarding disclosure,
JKM1993
CASE LIST request for certain teams.,
Jason Griffith
Disclsoure and debate, the 1NC To: ceda-l@cornell.edu Disclosure in debate,
JOSEPH H BOYLE
Internet Video Debates from Debate Central,
Alfred C. Snider
USC case list from Rd. 1,
Pacedebate
Reply to Tuna re disclosure,
JKM1993
Reply to Boyle re disclosure,
JKM1993
Reply to Ross re disclosure,
JKM1993
Reply to Ross re disclosure 2,
JKM1993
D. Hatton from SHSU,
Alfred C. Snider
Teams in elims at USC,
Pacedebate
New on Debate Central, January, 1996,
DebateCent
disclosure,
Josh
Index created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.0.0 beta 3