[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page
Re: Let's open the p20 can of worms again
>Further, and even stronger, there might be no free rider problem. If
>teams can be assured that some teams are picking as many as possible,
>games theory dictates all rational teams will follow to avoid those few
>teams' unpicked judge, especially if the teams picking as many as they can
>are competitive with a significant knowledge of the judging pool.
This is a very good point. We need to make sure and spread this knowledge
next semester before Nationals, and hopefully people will check a lot of
judges, because if they meet a team who picked 80 and they can't get a
match they will receive a judge that neither of them picked, which for one
team would be the bottom half of the pool.
It works for me.
I thus believe that the problem I mentioned earlier, that teams picking low
numbers of judges, would skew judge assignment, has been resolved in my
mind.
Alfred C. Snider AKA Tuna
Edwin W. Lawrence Professor of Forensics, University of Vermont
Mail: Box 54225, UVM, Burlington, VT 05405-4225
Phone: 802-656-0097, Fax: 802-656-4275
DEBATE CENTRAL:
http://beluga.uvm.edu/debatecentral/dc.html
gopher://beluga.uvm.edu
LAWRENCE DEBATE UNION:
http://beluga.uvm.edu/debatecentral/ldu.html
Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page