Re: Mutual pref/Pick at least 20

[Jack Rogers <Jack_Rogers%UT_TYLER@notes.worldcom.com>]

How is having only a little meaningful input into your judge 
selection worse than having none at all.

I respond with:  " I find it interesting that the claims supporting MPJ have 
gradually diminished from "it's the answer that assures fairness," to "how is 
having only a little meaningful input . . . worse than having none at all." 
Random/strike gives me as much or more meaningful input than MPJ.  I would 
prefer that we all be subject to the same randomness than to create a system 
that would seem -- it could be argued -- to create a system that favors those 
"in the know" at the expense of those "ignorant" of the choices.

---

Follow-Ups:

• Re: Mutual pref/Pick at least 20
• From: Aaron R Klemz <Aaron.R.Klemz-1@tc.umn.edu>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: Rogers' response
• Next by Date: Re: Debaters as Judges
• Prev by thread: Re: Mutual pref/Pick at least 20
• Next by thread: Re: Mutual pref/Pick at least 20
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page