Re: Mutual pref/Pick at least 20

[Jack Rogers <Jack_Rogers%UT_TYLER@notes.worldcom.com>]

I agree.  The non regional rule only makes the problem worse.  Now I'm stuck 
making choices that I know even less about.

I also agree with the two asides. :-)

"IT COULD BE ARGUED THAT" This statement is written in so that unsuspecting 
people will be able to CLEARLY identify this as a HYPOTHETICAL argument and I 
will not add a little smiley face that seems to make folks angry?

What if the smaller schools that have been back channeling me decided not to go 
to "nationals?"  If the number of schools dropped of, how would this impact the 
number of out-rounds available for those programs of "more than regional scope" 
who need as many points as they can get?  Perhaps, this is why, Dr. Rogers is 
attempting to get others to conduct a little self-reflection on their 
communication styles?  We don't need ANYONE, regardless of scope, to feel left 
out.

---

Follow-Ups:

• Re: Mutual pref/Pick at least 20
• From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: Mutual pref/Pick at least 20Re: Yes, Wyatt, there is a "santa"
• Next by Date: Directing Forensics Bibliography
• Prev by thread: Mutual pref/Pick at least 20
• Next by thread: Re: Mutual pref/Pick at least 20
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page