Re: Rogers' response

[Jack Rogers <Jack_Rogers%UT_TYLER@notes.worldcom.com>]

Thanks for taking the time to respond :-)

Two replies:

1) why no response to the valid?
2) You seem to miss the analysis that it doesn't really matter what you can 
accept or reject.  The fact is that there are many schools who have this 
perception and pretending that it dosen't exist and there aren't consequences 
because of it dosen't make the argument(or the perception) go away.

---

• Prev by Date: Re: flowing ev - I've been converted.
• Next by Date: Re: Mutual pref/Pick at least 20Re: Yes, Wyatt, there is a "santa"
• Prev by thread: Re: Rogers' response
• Next by thread: Re: Rogers' response
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page