[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page
Re: Rogers' response
Notice that these two disads, while, I suppose, not entirely
cancelling one another out, do pull in opposite directions. The bigger
the problem of "it's mutual A's, but only a guess-A for us," then,
necessarily, the smaller the problem of "we're getting mutual C's." And
vice-versa.
Precisely because (I think) each disad is partly true, neither
disad will be terribly significant.
Nor is either disad much unique. It's always a disadvantage to
not know as much of the judging pool as one's opponents do. What's
really going on, IMHO, is that the regional or newcomer programs manage
to put it out of their heads how much of a disadvantage they are at. But
when they are slapped in the face with that preference sheet, then the
full consciousness that they don't know very many of the judges is forced
upon them. They "know" in some not-quite-fully-conscious way that it's
true, but they have tricked themselves into forgetting it. But then that
darn preference sheet ruins the trick.
Mutual A, but yours is just a guess-A? How could that be worse
than random, where, since you don't know very much of the judging pool,
you have a high probability of a judge that knows your opponents but
never heard of you.
Mutual C's? At least the judge is a C for your opponent too.
That seems surely better than random, where you risk getting a judge who
would be a C for you but an A for your opponents.
Maybe what's going on is that certain regional or newcomer
programs are just hoping they'll get real lucky: they want to show up and
hope against hope that they'll get judges that are A's for them but B's
or C's for their opponents. MPJ squashes the hope for that kind of
luck. But is that really a hope that shouldn't be squashed?
- Meredith Garmon, Fisk U. (swore I'd never use that stupid
"IMHO" thing . . . wonder what made me lapse . . . )
References:
Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page