[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page
Re: Flowing evidence....
Although I have indicated that I disagree with Professor Mahoney
on the role of evidence, in this particular situation I'd probably go the
same way that I'm guessing he would go: Crocker wins. It's not entirely
clear though. I don't know what you mean by "80% thorough and reasoned,"
and I would have to look at the nature of the indict. But Crocker is
entirely undenied. Professor Eighty Percent has been indicted. The
claims taken by themselves are of equal magnitude. These are not claims
about the meaning of which there is much question. So the light that the
evidence would cast on their meaning probably would not, for me, outweigh
the fact that one is dropped cold and the other is indicted.
- Meredith Garmon, Fisk U.
References:
Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page