Re: traditional t

[Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>]

	I like it.  Sounds reasonable to me.  Aff. might still win, of 
course, depending on their answers, but I am inclined to be sympathetic 
to the argument.

	We've had a problem with affs winning a very high percentage of 
out-rounds--or indeed, any round with two pretty good teams.  Part of the 
problem is that judges are unwilling to enforce the topic (aren't as 
willing to vote neg on T as they ought to be), so there are way too many 
aff cases than negs can get ready for.

	- Meredith Garmon, Fisk U.

---

References:

• traditional t
• From: Debateone@aol.com

---

• Prev by Date: The LSAT & the CEDA-L
• Next by Date: Re: The LSAT & the CEDA-L
• Prev by thread: traditional t
• Next by thread: Re: traditional t
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page