CEDA-L Archive List (by Date)
Last updated: Tuesday July 15, 1997
607 messages in chronological order
Search This Archive
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page
- FW: Message on Internet re: LEXIS-NEXIS Educational Program
- From: "Johnson, Carol S." <carol.johnson@lexis-nexis.com>
- Re: Rogers' Rebuttal
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Re: Hypo.Counterplan Scenario
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Re: non-Mexico Mexico
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Re: Over"Bear"ing
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Re: Hypo.Counterplan Scenario
- Re: Johnson and Mexico
- From: Matthew Collins Johnson <johnsomc@whitman.edu>
- SIU grad schoolJust a reminder to those who requested information about the two graduate
- From: DEBATE@SIUCVMB.SIU.EDU
- Flat Preference
- From: Kenneth Broda-Bahm <broda@midget.towson.edu>
- Re: Rogers' Rebuttal
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- MPJ and Accountability
- From: sxwoods@moose.uvm.edu (Steve Woods)
- MPJ?
- From: STUMASSEYJB@MERCUR.USAO.EDU
- Re: MPJ and Accountability
- From: Earl Croasmun <croasmun@luna.cas.usf.edu>
- Re: MPJ and Accountability
- From: "chris swanson" <chris@anthro.com>
- Coaches Poll 12-1-95
- MPJ does not hurt the process of judge adaptation
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Re: MPJ and Accountability
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Re: Rogers' Rebuttal
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- New on Debate Central 12-95
- traditional t
- Re: MPJ and Accountability
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Re: MPJ?
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- The LSAT & the CEDA-L
- From: mroskoski@cctr.umkc.edu (Matthew K. Roskoski)
- Re: traditional t
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Re: The LSAT & the CEDA-L
- From: "Maxwell D. Schnurer" <mschnure@moose.uvm.edu>
- Re: LSAT & CEDA-L
- From: "Vikas N Shah" <shahvika@pilot.msu.edu>
- Re: LSAT & CEDA-L
- From: Ender <ender@whidbey.net>
- Trolling and catching a Tuna on apda-l On Sat, 2 Dec 1995, Meridith Garmon wrote:
- From: BEBT84D@prodigy.com ( RICK MILLER)
- Flowing evidence....
- FWD>Christmass Cheer for E-Mail Addicts
- From: William Loges <William_Loges@BAYLOR.EDU>
- Re: Flowing evidence....
- From: Earl Croasmun <croasmun@luna.cas.usf.edu>
- Re: Flowing evidence....
- From: "Jason A. Nordwick" <nordwick@uclink2.berkeley.edu>
- Re: Trolling and catching a Tuna on apda-l
- Rogers' response
- From: Jack Rogers <Jack_Rogers%UT_TYLER@notes.worldcom.com>
- Re: Flowing evidence....
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Re: Flowing evidence....
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Re: Trolling and catching a Tuna on apda-l
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Flaming Dreams
- From: Stefan Andre Bauschard <bauscsa4@wfu.edu>
- LSAT TRICK QUESTION
- From: "Carson Brackney" <Carson_Brackney.ESC@ELLIOTT.ES.TWSU.EDU>
- Reading Evidence
- From: "Carson Brackney" <Carson_Brackney.ESC@ELLIOTT.ES.TWSU.EDU>
- Re: Flowing evidence....
- From: Steven Hunt <hunt@lclark.edu>
- Re: The LSAT & the CEDA-L
- From: Pat <pjgehrke@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- Random Thoughts on Reading Evidence
- From: Stefan Andre Bauschard <bauscsa4@wfu.edu>
- A Tag-Flowing Hypothetical Question
- From: dumas@gonzaga.edu (James M. Dumas)
- flowing ev.....
- Re: Trolling and catching a Tuna on apda-l
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Re: Random Thoughts on Reading Evidence
- From: Steven Hunt <hunt@lclark.edu>
- Dear Santa: Viva' Mexico
- From: BEBT84D@prodigy.com ( RICK MILLER)
- Re: Flowing evidence....
- From: "Michael K. Davis" <davismk@mailbox.syr.edu>
- Flowing Evidence - Has the Emperor No Clothes?
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Re: The LSAT & the CEDA-L
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Re:Garmon on "MPJ and Accountability"
- From: sxwoods@moose.uvm.edu (Steve Woods)
- Re: flowing ev.....
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Dear Santa :-)
- From: "Jason Cruce Trice" <tricejas@pilot.msu.edu>
- Flaming Dreams -Reply
- From: MICHAEL BRYANT <MBRYANT@weber.edu>
- More on MTSU JOB -- Easier Application Process
- From: "Russell T. Church" <rchurch@frank.mtsu.edu>
- Re: Flowing evidence....
- From: "Maxwell D. Schnurer" <mschnure@moose.uvm.edu>
- Re: traditional t
- From: Rebecca L Congo <JM86STU@SEMOVM.SEMO.EDU>
- Flowing ev
- From: WHITNEMR@snymorva.cs.snymor.edu
- Re: traditional t
- From: ross12@MARSHALL.EDU
- Re: Flowing Evidence - Has the Emperor No Clothes?
- From: Nicholas F Burnett <nburnett@saclink1.csus.edu>
- santa
- From: "Geoffrey M Wyatt" <wyattgeo@pilot.msu.edu>
- Re: Rogers' response
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Re: A Tag-Flowing Hypothetical Question
- From: Adri <broveraf@wfu.edu>
- Re: Flowing evidence....
- From: Earl Croasmun <croasmun@luna.cas.usf.edu>
- evidence and flowing
- From: Brian R McGee <bmcgee@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
- Re: A Tag-Flowing Hypothetical Question
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- RE: santa
- From: tbarnes@CCTR.UMKC.EDU
- Re: santa
- From: luchettis@urvax.urich.edu
- Re: Flowing ev
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Re: santa
- From: p69h4j3y@umiami.ir.miami.edu
- flowing ev - I've been converted.
- Re: A Tag-Flowing Hypothetical Question
- From: "Jason A. Nordwick" <nordwick@uclink2.berkeley.edu>
- serious, controversial issues
- From: amc17@cornell.edu (adam chud)
- Re: Rogers' response
- From: Jack Rogers <Jack_Rogers%UT_TYLER@notes.worldcom.com>
- The grinch that stole the (-: person
- From: BEBT84D@prodigy.com ( RICK MILLER)
- Lsat and ceda-l
- Re: A Tag-Flowing Hypothetical Question
- From: Earl Croasmun <croasmun@luna.cas.usf.edu>
- Re: Random Thoughts on Reading Evidence
- From: Earl Croasmun <croasmun@luna.cas.usf.edu>
- Re: santa
- From: Sarah Michell Glaser <glasers@ksu.ksu.edu>
- Re: serious, controversial issues
- From: Ender <ender@whidbey.net>
- Re: serious, controversial issues
- From: batesbenj@urvax.urich.edu
- Evidence
- From: Earl Croasmun <croasmun@luna.cas.usf.edu>
- geoff - cranky
- From: Rebecca S Opsata <opsata@ksu.ksu.edu>
- Bob Dole
- From: MBRYANT@cc.weber.edu
- the truth about "santa"
- From: "Geoffrey M Wyatt" <wyattgeo@pilot.msu.edu>
- Mutual pref/Pick at least 20
- Re: serious, controversial issues
- From: luchettis@urvax.urich.edu
- Re: the truth about "santa"
- From: Sarah Michell Glaser <glasers@ksu.ksu.edu>
- Re: the truth about "santa"
- From: Ender <ender@whidbey.net>
- Re: Rogers' response
- From: Aaron R Klemz <Aaron.R.Klemz-1@tc.umn.edu>
- Santa Speaks!!
- From: Santa Claus <jherna10@calstatela.edu>
- No Subject
- From: amc17@cornell.edu (Adam Chud)
- Re: the truth about "santa" Re: Mutual pref/Pick at least 20
- From: "Michael R. Dickman" <mdickman@cc.cumber.edu> "Michael R. Dickman" <mdickman@cc.cumber.edu>
- Re: flowing ev - I've been converted.
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Re: Rogers' response
- From: Jack Rogers <Jack_Rogers%UT_TYLER@notes.worldcom.com>
- Re: Mutual pref/Pick at least 20 Re: Yes, Wyatt, there is a "santa"
- From: Jack Rogers <Jack_Rogers%UT_TYLER@notes.worldcom.com> Jack Rogers <Jack_Rogers%UT_TYLER@notes.worldcom.com>
- Re: Mutual pref/Pick at least 20
- From: Jack Rogers <Jack_Rogers%UT_TYLER@notes.worldcom.com>
- Directing Forensics Bibliography
- From: Steven Hunt <hunt@lclark.edu>
- The Border Skirmish Debate Tournament at Allegheny College The Border Skirmish Debate Tournament Allegheny College Meadville, PA January 27 & 28, 1996
- From: Daniel Joyce <joyced@alleg.EDU>
- Schedule for C EDA Natioanls
- From: Steven Hunt <hunt@lclark.edu>
- flowing evidence etc.
- From: Gina Lane <laneg@william.jewell.edu>
- Re: Flowing evidence....
- From: "Maxwell D. Schnurer" <mschnure@moose.uvm.edu>
- CEDA Nationals
- From: Steven Hunt <hunt@lclark.edu>
- Re: Directing Forensics Bibliography
- From: Steven Hunt <hunt@lclark.edu>
- Re: Regional Constraints (fwd)
- From: Steven Hunt <hunt@lclark.edu>
- Re: Yes, Wyatt, there is a "santa" -Reply
- From: Glen Strickland <STRICKLG@esumail.emporia.edu>
- STAM Journal
- From: scprest@umslvma.umsl.edu (Tom Preston)
- Re: Santa Speaks!!
- From: luchettis@urvax.urich.edu
- Response to Jack Rogers Re: Santa Claus
- From: "Michael R. Dickman" <mdickman@cc.cumber.edu> Jack Rogers <Jack_Rogers%UT_TYLER@notes.worldcom.com>
- subscribe CEDA-L Re: flowing ev.....
- From: Angela Aguayo <aguayo@csulb.edu> Hopper Gregory G <ggh237s@nic.smsu.edu>
- Tags etc. (Fwd) How to Argue Effectively (fwd)
- From: Josh <IFJXH@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU> Yuval Malchi <ymalchi@mailbox.syr.edu>
- Re: Dear Santa :-)
- From: Hopper Gregory G <ggh237s@nic.smsu.edu>
- re:Matt and LSATS Re: Nationals Dates
- From: Josh <IFJXH@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU> Gary Larson <g-larson@david.wheaton.edu>
- Re: subscribe CEDA-L
- From: Terry Noland <dnoland@selu.edu>
- Re: flowing evidence etc.
- From: Earl Croasmun <croasmun@luna.cas.usf.edu>
- Re: Regional Constraints
- From: Pat <pjgehrke@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- Re: Mutual pref/Pick at least 20 -Reply
- From: Jack Rogers <Jack_Rogers%UT_TYLER@notes.worldcom.com>
- Re: Yes, Wyatt, there is a "santa"
- From: "Geoffrey M Wyatt" <wyattgeo@pilot.msu.edu>
- Re: Rogers' response
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Mr. Hopper, tell us about evidence...
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Re: Santa Speaks!! On Tues, 05 Dec, Scott wrote (responding to "deer-roids")----
- From: BEBT84D@prodigy.com ( RICK MILLER)
- Re: Regional Constraints (fwd)
- From: Gary Larson <g-larson@david.wheaton.edu>
- Re: Mutual pref/Pick at least 20
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Re: Santa Claus
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Debaters as Judges
- From: dls10@cornell.edu (Derek Shaffer)
- Re: Santa Speaks!!
- From: luchettis@urvax.urich.edu
- Oxford and Mardi Gras ?'s
- From: Rebecca L Congo <JM86STU@SEMOVM.SEMO.EDU>
- Santa Claus
- From: Virginia <virginia@heaven.org>
- Re: Santa Speaks!!
- From: Ender <ender@whidbey.net>
- SANTA HELP!!!!!
- From: "Carson Brackney" <Carson_Brackney.ESC@ELLIOTT.ES.TWSU.EDU>
- Christmas Spirit
- From: Bob Roberts <bob@bob.com>
- coaches poll comments
- Re: Topicality--ten starting points for standards
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- coaches poll comments (fwd)
- From: william sheffield <hcspc014@dewey.csun.edu>
- Re: flowing evidence etc.
- From: "Maxwell D. Schnurer" <mschnure@moose.uvm.edu>
- Re: Mr. Hopper, tell us about evidence...
- From: "Maxwell D. Schnurer" <mschnure@moose.uvm.edu>
- Re: Debaters as Judges
- From: Earl Croasmun <croasmun@luna.cas.usf.edu>
- Re: flowing evidence etc.
- From: Earl Croasmun <croasmun@luna.cas.usf.edu>
- synthesis
- From: rodger biles <BILESROD%ESUVM.BITNET@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU>
- Re: Rogers' response
- From: Jack Rogers <Jack_Rogers%UT_TYLER@notes.worldcom.com>
- Re: Mutual pref/Pick at least 20
- From: Jack Rogers <Jack_Rogers%UT_TYLER@notes.worldcom.com>
- Re: Debaters as Judges
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Re: Regional Constraints
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- re:student judges
- From: "Terry West" <WEST@EDU-SUU-CENTRUM.CN.SUU.EDU>
- Re: flowing evidence etc.
- From: Aaron R Klemz <Aaron.R.Klemz-1@tc.umn.edu>
- Re: Debaters as Judges
- From: Derek Lawrence Shaffer <dls10@cornell.edu>
- Re: Santa Speaks!!
- From: BEBT84D@prodigy.com ( RICK MILLER)
- A reply for Bear <Re: Debaters as Judges>
- From: "M. Benson" <mbenson@u.washington.edu>
- student judges
- From: amc17@cornell.edu (adam chud)
- Re: Debaters as Judges
- From: Gary Larson <g-larson@david.wheaton.edu>
- regional constraints
- Re: Debaters as judges
- From: "Carson Brackney" <Carson_Brackney.ESC@ELLIOTT.ES.TWSU.EDU>
- Regional restraints with pick 20
- From: Steven Hunt <hunt@lclark.edu>
- student judges -Reply
- From: Jared Phillips <PHILLIJM@WPOFFICE.WHITMAN.EDU>
- students judging
- Re: Regional Constraints -Reply
- From: Glen Strickland <STRICKLG@esumail.emporia.edu>
- Re: Debaters as judges
- From: Adri <broveraf@wfu.edu>
- A reply for Bear <Re: Debaters as Judges> -Reply
- From: Glen Strickland <STRICKLG@esumail.emporia.edu>
- Re: A reply for Bear <Re: Debaters as Judges>
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Re: Debaters as judges
- From: Smash <rileykd@pacificu.edu>
- Student Judges
- From: WHITNEMR@snymorva.cs.snymor.edu
- Regional Constraints
- Re: A reply for Bear <Re: Debaters as Judges>
- From: "M. Benson" <mbenson@u.washington.edu>
- Re: Debaters as judges
- From: Earl Croasmun <croasmun@luna.cas.usf.edu>
- Re: flowing evidence etc.
- From: Earl Croasmun <croasmun@luna.cas.usf.edu>
- Re: A reply for Bear <Re: Debaters as Judges>
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Re: Debaters as Judges
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- What's New In Debater's Monthly
- From: benjamin r bates <brb5f@turing.urich.edu>
- Re: A reply for Bear <Re: Debaters as Judges>
- From: "M. Benson" <mbenson@u.washington.edu>
- Re: A reply for Bear <Re: Debaters as Judges> (fwd)
- From: "M. Benson" <mbenson@u.washington.edu>
- Re: A reply for Bear <Re: Debaters as Judges>
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Re: A reply for Bear <Re: Debaters as Judges>
- From: "M. Benson" <mbenson@u.washington.edu>
- Re: regional constraints
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Re: Regional restraints with pick 20
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Santa's Annual Report
- From: tbarnes@CCTR.UMKC.EDU
- Re: Debaters as Judges
- From: Jennifer Kleven <n9342765@scooter.cc.wwu.edu>
- re:student judges
- From: jhobbs@acuvax.acu.edu
- Re: What's New In Debater's Monthly
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- student judges
- From: Valerie Regi Renegar <renegar@ksu.ksu.edu>
- Re: Mr. Hopper, tell us about evidence...
- From: Hopper Gregory G <ggh237s@nic.smsu.edu>
- FSU Coaching Assistants
- From: James Brey <jbrey@garnet.acns.fsu.edu>
- Student Judges
- From: aad853@Waldo.Angelo.Edu (Phil Barron)
- Student Judges -Reply
- From: Jared Phillips <PHILLIJM@WPOFFICE.WHITMAN.EDU>
- Re: student judges -Reply
- From: amc17@cornell.edu (Adam Chud)
- spring 1996 topic
- From: DAVID GRASSMICK <JZMM@MARISTB.MARIST.EDU>
- Re: Student Judges
- From: Matt Siemens <msiemens@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- Re: flowing evidence etc.
- From: "Maxwell D. Schnurer" <mschnure@moose.uvm.edu>
- Re: Debaters as Judges
- From: Gary Larson <g-larson@david.wheaton.edu>
- Nationals Dates
- From: lfarstveet@CCTR.UMKC.EDU
- Debater judges with strikes
- From: Harris Martin C <mch766s@nic.smsu.edu>
- Debaters as Judges is a bad idea
- From: "Norah E. Dunbar" <nedunbar@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- Re: Regional Constraints
- From: Harris Martin C <mch766s@nic.smsu.edu>
- Why bother with topic areas?
- From: "Norah E. Dunbar" <nedunbar@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- re:student judges
- From: Harris Martin C <mch766s@nic.smsu.edu>
- Re: Mr. Hopper, tell us about evidence...
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Students should judge... but why vote?
- From: wedge@usa1.com (Glenn Ellingson)
- Re: Why bother with topic areas?
- From: wedge@usa1.com (Glenn Ellingson)
- Re: Mutual pref/Pick at least 20
- From: Aaron R Klemz <Aaron.R.Klemz-1@tc.umn.edu>
- Subscription
- From: Mitchell Scott A <sam151s@nic.smsu.edu>
- student judges
- From: erica@uclink.berkeley.edu (Erica Grosjean)
- re:student judges--Double Standard in Evidence
- From: jhobbs@acuvax.acu.edu
- Re: (Fwd) How to Argue Effectively (fwd)
- From: Terry Noland <dnoland@selu.edu>
- Re: Mutual pref/Pick at least 20
- From: Jack Rogers <Jack_Rogers%UT_TYLER@notes.worldcom.com>
- Re: Why bother with topic areas?
- From: Pat <pjgehrke@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- Evidence-Student Judge Double Standard
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Re: Santa Speaks!!
- From: luchettis@urvax.urich.edu
- Re: Why bother with topic ar
- From: "Carson Brackney" <Carson_Brackney.ESC@ELLIOTT.ES.TWSU.EDU>
- Re: Mr. Hopper, tell us about evidence...
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Re: student judges -Reply
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Nick Burnett (others feel free to delete)
- From: "Eric L. Krug" <COEK@FHSUVM.FHSU.EDU>
- Re: spring 1996 topic
- From: sxwoods@moose.uvm.edu (Steve Woods)
- Re: Why bother with topic areas?
- From: "Norah E. Dunbar" <nedunbar@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- re:student judges
- From: Gregory Alan Achten <achten@ksu.ksu.edu>
- email addresses
- From: amc17@cornell.edu (Adam Chud)
- Re: spring 1996 topic
- From: Gregory Alan Achten <achten@ksu.ksu.edu>
- student judges and grosjean
- From: amc17@cornell.edu (Adam Chud)
- re: Evidence-Student Judge Double Standard
- From: jhobbs@acuvax.acu.edu
- re: student judges - evidence double standard
- From: jhobbs@acuvax.acu.edu
- Re: Why bother with topic a
- From: "Carson Brackney" <Carson_Brackney.ESC@ELLIOTT.ES.TWSU.EDU>
- re:student judges
- From: nshof4838@ALPHA.NSULA.EDU
- Re: spring 1996 topic -Reply
- From: Glen Strickland <STRICKLG@esumail.emporia.edu>
- re:student judges
- From: Steven Hunt <hunt@lclark.edu>
- NDT ALUMNI
- Make your opinions known!
- From: Alyson Lynn Lewis <all5@cornell.edu>
- Re: Debaters as Judges
- From: dls10@cornell.edu (Derek Shaffer)
- Update on GSL
- From: Rebecca Bjork <Rebecca.Bjork@m.cc.utah.edu>
- Western Tournament???
- From: Nicholas F Burnett <nburnett@saclink1.csus.edu>
- re:student judges
- From: Matt Siemens <msiemens@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- Re: Debaters as Judges
- From: Gary Larson <g-larson@david.wheaton.edu>
- Research sources on the web
- From: luchettis@urvax.urich.edu
- re:student judges
- From: Jeannie Hunt <jhunt@CSCU.csc.edu>
- re:student judges
- From: Gregory Alan Achten <achten@ksu.ksu.edu>
- re: student judges - evidence double standard
- From: Gregory Alan Achten <achten@ksu.ksu.edu>
- Immigration / 187 Evidence
- From: Pat <pjgehrke@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- power rankings info needed
- Re: Judge Intervention as Argument Teacher is Inevitable
- From: "Terry West" <WEST@EDU-SUU-CENTRUM.CN.SUU.EDU>
- Re: Mr. Hopper
- From: "Terry West" <WEST@EDU-SUU-CENTRUM.CN.SUU.EDU>
- theory ev.
- From: sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu (Meredith Garmon)
- theory evidence
- From: Brian R McGee <bmcgee@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
- Re: Immigration / 187 Evidence
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Peruvian Arguments
- From: TY ADAMS <adams@uamont.edu>
- Mr. Hopper
- From: John Fritch <JEF229F@vma.smsu.edu>
- partner needed
- From: amc17@cornell.edu (Adam Chud)
- Re: Peruvian Arguments
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Re: Chiapas Info Source
- From: "Carson Brackney" <Carson_Brackney.ESC@ELLIOTT.ES.TWSU.EDU>
- TOPIC
- From: Nicholas F Burnett <nburnett@saclink1.csus.edu>
- A message to "lurkers" and small schools
- From: uuuno@nywork2.undp.org (Unitarian Universalist UN Office)
- Student Judges
- From: gmiller@mail.sdsu.edu (Greg Miller)
- equal burdens
- From: uuuno@nywork2.undp.org (Unitarian Universalist UN Office)
- re:student judges
- From: william sheffield <hcspc014@dewey.csun.edu>
- TOPIC
- From: "Debate and Forensics" <Debate_and_Forensics.ESC@ELLIOTT.ES.TWSU.EDU>
- It is Mexico
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Spring 96 topic
- From: Gregory Alan Achten <achten@ksu.ksu.edu>
- re: student judges - evidence double standard
- From: william sheffield <hcspc014@dewey.csun.edu>
- TOPIC -Reply
- From: Glen Strickland <STRICKLG@esumail.emporia.edu>
- Re: Spring 1996 Topic
- From: Gary Larson <g-larson@david.wheaton.edu>
- Re: Spring 1996 Topic
- From: Gary Larson <g-larson@david.wheaton.edu>
- Re: Immigration / 187 Evidence
- From: Pat <pjgehrke@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- Re: TOPIC -Reply
- From: Debate <debate@stimpy.acofi.edu>
- Why, of course!
- From: TY ADAMS <adams@uamont.edu>
- Will Baker and bad flowing by debaters...
- TOPIC
- From: baker@lightspeed.net
- Thinking about fiat?
- From: Kenneth Broda-Bahm <broda@midget.towson.edu>
- re:student judges
- From: Matt Siemens <msiemens@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- Re: Immigration / 187 Evidence
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Re: Immigration / 187 Evidence
- From: "Vikas N Shah" <shahvika@pilot.msu.edu>
- Re: Chiapas Info Source
- From: Terry Noland <dnoland@selu.edu>
- Re: Fiesta Results
- From: Josh <IFJXH@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU>
- Re: Immigration / 187 Evide
- From: "Carson Brackney" <Carson_Brackney.ESC@ELLIOTT.ES.TWSU.EDU>
- No Subject
- From: kjohnson_at_soros-ny@mail.sorosny.org
- Re: New Tournament part 2
- From: Josh <IFJXH@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU>
- NDT and Kentucky Just two quick requests. First, could someone please mail me the necessary NEW TOURNAMENT PART ONE PLEASE READ!
- From: tbarnes@CCTR.UMKC.EDU Josh <IFJXH@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU>
- Tuna's Christmas Gift - the UCO Case List
- Virtual Arsenals
- From: CTESKE@macalstr.edu
- Debate in the Balkans? I think the idea of bringing the debate to the Balkans is a good one, but a I believe that USA CG (Clinton/ Gore) has gone to mediate (or judge) the I guess it is a round robin? I have seen several debate teams get upset I awoke this morning to see a picture on the front of "USA TODAY" showing I am sorry if I seem cynical, but it is hard to imagine bringing debate to a It is Mexico(in case you haven't figured that out!!!!!)el topico es mexico, para las personas que no conocen, muchos personasescriben.I think we got the freakin' picture~!!!! infor tech FWD: ALERT:INTERNET DAY OF PROTEST TUESDAY DECEMBER 12, 1995 (fwd)
- From: tbarnes@CCTR.UMKC.EDU emslusher@CCTR.UMKC.EDU fstevens@CCTR.UMKC.EDU Matt Siemens <msiemens@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- Re: Debaters as Judges
- From: Glen Clatterbuck <clatter@hilltop.ic.edu>
- USC/ HOTEL & FLIGHT INFO (fwd)
- From: Matthew Taylor <taylorm@csulb.edu>
- Re: Debaters as Judges
- From: Earl Croasmun <croasmun@luna.cas.usf.edu>
- re:speed
- From: "Michael Miroslav Korcok" <mk48@cornell.edu>
- Warning, warning-- head explosions!
- From: "Natalie D. Yarwood" <yarwoond@whitman.edu>
- Speed
- From: haykengre@urvax.urich.edu
- Re: ALERT:INTERNET DAY OF PROTEST TUESDAY DECEMBER 12, 1995 (fwd) Evidence Ethics Policy
- From: Miles452@aol.com Kenneth Broda-Bahm <broda@midget.towson.edu>
- Speed and flowing and Mike Korcok
- Speed in the Game & Mr. Hayken
- Re: Speed and flowing and Mike Korcok
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Re: Speed
- From: Steven Hunt <hunt@lclark.edu>
- Re: Speed and flowing and Mike Korcok
- From: Aaron R Klemz <Aaron.R.Klemz-1@tc.umn.edu>
- Re: Speed and flowing and Mike Korcok
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- re:speed
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- definitions
- UMKC and virtual deterrence...
- From: "Jason A. Nordwick" <nordwick@uclink2.berkeley.edu>
- Re: FWD: ALERT:INTERNET DAY OF PROTEST TUESDAY DECEMBER 12, 1995 (fwd)
- From: "Jason A. Nordwick" <nordwick@uclink2.berkeley.edu>
- Re[2]: Speed and flowing and Mike Korcok
- From: Rebecca L Congo <JM86STU@SEMOVM.SEMO.EDU>
- Couple of Things
- From: "Vikas N Shah" <shahvika@pilot.msu.edu>
- Re: Will Baker and bad flowing by debaters...
- From: "Jason A. Nordwick" <nordwick@uclink2.berkeley.edu>
- sorry umkc about the thread...
- From: "Jason A. Nordwick" <nordwick@uclink2.berkeley.edu>
- Virtual Arsenals
- From: spointer@CCTR.UMKC.EDU
- apology to pointer from umkc
- From: "Jason A. Nordwick" <nordwick@uclink2.berkeley.edu>
- Re: Chiapas Info Source
- From: Terry Noland <dnoland@selu.edu>
- Ken--re the CEDA Evidence Document
- From: Jim Hanson <HANSONJB@WPOFFICE.WHITMAN.EDU>
- Re: Will Baker and bad flowing by debaters...
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Re: apology to pointer from umkc
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Re: sorry umkc about the thread...
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Re: apology to pointer from umkc
- From: "Jason A. Nordwick" <nordwick@uclink2.berkeley.edu>
- Virtual Arsenals
- The Debate Home Page
- From: luchettis@urvax.urich.edu
- Re: Evidence Ethics
- From: bc70022@bingsuns.cc.binghamton.edu
- Re: Mr. Hopper
- Re: Speed and flowing and Mike Korcok
- From: Aaron R Klemz <Aaron.R.Klemz-1@tc.umn.edu>
- TOPIC -Reply
- From: Glen Strickland <STRICKLG@esumail.emporia.edu>
- Lisa Heller of Richmond
- Re: Virtual Arsenals
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Help me delete the right documents
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Re: Speed
- From: mdugaw@wln.com (Mike Dugaw)
- CEDA President Steven Hunt has established a committee to examine the area of access to electronic r
- From: Glen Strickland <STRICKLG@esumail.emporia.edu>
- **Re: Chiapas Sources
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Defending Korcok (resp. to Bear)
- From: Pat <pjgehrke@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- Re: **Re: Chiapas Sources
- From: Terry Noland <dnoland@selu.edu>
- **RE: Defending Korcok (Response to Pat)
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Re: Speed
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- someone from syracuse
- From: ocallaghan kellie an <z947427@oats.farm.niu.edu>
- Share Room at USC
- From: Pat <pjgehrke@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- Re: Speed
- From: Steven Hunt <hunt@lclark.edu>
- Re: Speed
- From: mdugaw@wln.com (Mike Dugaw)
- Long Beach Tourny
- From: Matthew Taylor <taylorm@csulb.edu>
- **
- From: "Carson Brackney" <Carson_Brackney.ESC@ELLIOTT.ES.TWSU.EDU>
- The Gingrinch who stole congress (fwd)
- From: "Russell T. Church" <rchurch@frank.mtsu.edu>
- Cornell U. Tournament Invitation, Feb. 9-11
- From: forensics@cornell.edu (forensics@cornell.edu)
- Re: Defending Korcok (resp. to Bear)
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- **RE: Defending Korcok (Response to Honiball)
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Re: Speed
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Re: Speed
- Re: **Re: Chiapas Sources
- From: "Jason A. Nordwick" <nordwick@uclink2.berkeley.edu>
- **XXZZ: mail forwards...
- From: "Jason A. Nordwick" <nordwick@uclink2.berkeley.edu>
- Fwd: Re: Will Baker and bad flowing by debaters...
- Looking for Steve Clemmons Re: **RE: Defending Korcok (Response to Pat)
- From: MARCE@ASU.Edu Jonathan T Honiball <honiball@hopper.unh.edu>
- Re: **RE: Defending Korcok (Response to Honiball)
- From: Jonathan T Honiball <honiball@hopper.unh.edu>
- E-Mail Rating Codes
- From: mroskoski@cctr.umkc.edu (Matthew K. Roskoski)
- Adam Chud & Debater for WJC and KSU
- From: "Jason Cruce Trice" <tricejas@pilot.msu.edu>
- Seig Heil!!! FY
- From: mroskoski@cctr.umkc.edu (Matthew K. Roskoski)
- Re: **Re: Chiapas Sources
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Saluki hotelThe Comfort, the tournament hotel for the Saluki, is filling up. If you
- From: DEBATE@SIUCVMB.SIU.EDU
- Arrogance
- Re: **RE: Defending Korcok (Response to Honiball)
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Speed
- From: Matthew Taylor <taylorm@csulb.edu>
- Speed
- From: dmuschel@mail.gac.peachnet.edu (David Muschell)
- Re: Speed
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Chiapas-l list...
- From: Terry Noland <dnoland@selu.edu>
- Re: Speed
- From: mdugaw@wln.com (Mike Dugaw)
- Re: Speed
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Re: **Re: Chiapas Sources
- From: Pat <pjgehrke@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- Re: Arroganceam rather disturbed by the tone and attitude you display in this post. IWhen I judge debate I always tell students what I prefer in the round.
- From: mdugaw@wln.com (Mike Dugaw)
- Re: Defending Korcok (resp. to Garmon)
- From: Pat <pjgehrke@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- speed
- honiball responds to bear
- From: Jonathan T Honiball <honiball@hopper.unh.edu>
- Re: **Re: Chiapas Sources
- From: Steven Hunt <hunt@lclark.edu>
- Re: Arrogance
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Re: Arrogance
- From: Steven Hunt <hunt@lclark.edu>
- Bear Begs for An End!
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Re: Speed
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Re: Speed
- From: baker@lightspeed.net
- Tournament?
- From: Josh <IFJXH@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU>
- re: Evidence
- From: Josh <IFJXH@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU>
- Re: Defending Korcok (resp. to Garmon)
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Arrogance!!
- From: "Jason Cruce Trice" <tricejas@pilot.msu.edu>
- Re: Arrogance
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- HEY SIU (others delete)
- From: "Scott Titsworth *** Northeast Missouri State" <LL81%NEMOMUS.bitnet@ACADEMIC.NEMOSTATE.EDU>
- Re: Net Evidence (was: Chiapas Sources)
- From: Pat <pjgehrke@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- CEDA-L CASE LIST THE CEDA-L CASE LIST ====================
- From: dumas@gonzaga.edu (James M. Dumas)
- defense of Korcok
- From: "Jason Cruce Trice" <tricejas@pilot.msu.edu>
- Soros Foundation Debate Program I'd like to interrupt your discussions to tell you about an interesting debate program developing in Eastern Europe. My name is Katherine Johnson. I am working with the Soros Foundation on a project developing debate in Eastern and Central Europe, The Balkans and Central Asia. Some of you are already familiar with The Soros Foundation and have been assisting us with the project...Thank you! For those of you that are not familiar please let me take a moment to explain our program. In March 1994, The Soros Foundation invited 60 people from 18 countries throughout E.Europe to Budapest Hungary to learn about a new program that could be introduced into their schools. The participants, mostly high school teachers, came expecting to learn new teaching methods from an organization they had heard a lot about. What they received was an introduction to debate; an activity that was both challenging and intimidating to most of them. The training was run by two Hungarian women, one of which was a professor of Applied English Linguistics who had recently returned from a year in Australia where she learned about Debate. The other was a high school English teacher who assisted with lectures, research material etc. The initial training gave a brief, very general idea of debate, rhetoric, and its application in the classroom. Although not presenting a complete picture of debate, the initial training was very successful in sparking the interests. Before leaving Hungary, The Soros Foundation explained their offer for funding the debate program. The program would include funds for: 1. A Debate Center: which is an office/room which should be used by both the administration and the debaters as a meeting point. ie. a club location. 2. Subscriptions and Research material for the Center. 3. Office Equipment to be used at the Center. 4. Salaries for the teachers who develop this program at their schools. 5. All travel and accomodation for debaters relating to tournaments. 6. Salaries for three administrators for each country. Excited by the many opportunities offered to them through the debate program, many of the participants returned to their countries and began the program. They submitted budgets, hired people, found debate center locations and generally worked to develop the program in their countries. Within 10 months the program had grown faster than any other youth program in the Foundation. The budget doubled and the demand was growing. Debate was a hit in Eastern Europe! The problem was that the initial training had not prepared the Soros Foundation employees or the debaters for this type of growth. The quality of debate varied depending on how well the initial teachers understood the Budapest training. Rules varied from country to country as did the teaching methods. A more uniform program needed to be developed to meet the growing needs. I was hired to assist in developing this program. For the last six months I have been travelling throughout the region, assessing the program, training new teachers, and generally identifying each country's developmental needs which tended to vary. Two weeks ago I returned to the United States after two and a half years in Eastern Europe (it was wonderful to come home!) and am now beginning my work in developing teaching material for the European debate program. My goal is to develop: 1. Video tapes: A. Teachers. I envision an instructional tape for teachers which would involve classroom activities allowing the teacher to see how debate instruction is structured. ** It is important to note hear that the teaching style and in general the classroom environment in the former Soviet Union is very different than the United States. So often times, the most difficult concept for the teacher to grasp is "open discussion" during the lessons. B. Students. A tape showing a debate that at times pauses to point out mistakes or strong points of the debaters. Students are very interested in debate but is limited because of the lack of instruction. We need to develop a tape for the students to get more specific, advanced instruction. 2. Written Materials. One of the biggest barriers in getting the teachers to begin debate in their classroom is the lack of materials to offer them. Teachers in any country prefer to have textbooks and classroom exercises to use during their lessons...particularly when teaching something they only partially understand themselves. We are therefore working on introductory materials to offer them for approximately the first 10 weeks of debate instruction. 3. Audio to accompany the book, to assist in teaching persuasion, intonation etc. I am aware that similar material has been published in the United States. I have reviewed many books and tapes and in some cases have found them useful. The problem frankly is that the program in E. Europe is not as advanced and structurally is a bit different. It is a cross between L.D. and Policy as there is no plan but the topics tend to be similar to that of Policy..(ie. The government has an obligation to take care of its poor). The debate is three on three with two sets of cross examinations. The focus is much more on public speaking and persuasion skills which is, in my opinion, unfortunately not true in the more recent style of U.S. debate. The differences go on and on, not to mention the language problem that many of the U.S. materials pose to non native speakers. So there is my situation. In the next three to four months I will be working on developing materials specifically for the Soros Program. What I am looking for from anyone that is interested in helping are suggestions on effective books, videos etc. that might give me some ideas on how best to approach this project. I am also looking for imput from anyone with innovative ideas on developing this material. I feel certain that most of you have, through your own teaching, developed classroom exercises for debate instruction. I would love to hear from you! Please keep in mind, that the materials we develop will have to be completely self explanatory. We must assume that the user will be a tired, underpaid teacher with only a two day introductory course of debate and a lot of good intentions. If you have any questions, comments or ideas please write me at kjohnson@sorosny.org. Sincerely, Katherine Johnson P.S. I think the Mexico resolution is interesting but more importanly helpful in making students more aware of other countries. One of the most frustrating aspects of our culture is how uninformed we tend to be about other countries and cultures.
- From: kjohnson@mail.sorosny.org
- Re: Speed
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Looking for cites
- Forensics TAships
- From: william sheffield <hcspc014@dewey.csun.edu>
- The Debate Home Page Survey
- From: luchettis@urvax.urich.edu
- SB**!!- Bear is WRONG. On Mon, 11 Dec 1995, Bear, responding to J. Honiball, wrote:
- From: BEBT84D@prodigy.com ( RICK MILLER)
- Re: Arrogance
- From: "Carson Brackney" <Carson_Brackney.ESC@ELLIOTT.ES.TWSU.EDU>
- Arroganceam rather disturbed by the tone and attitude you display in this post. I
- **, xx, jj, !!, zz, ui, fy, dm-top ten reasons Mexico sucks!
- From: emslusher@CCTR.UMKC.EDU
- Lemoine vs. Snackbar
- From: emslusher@CCTR.UMKC.EDU
- Hybrid Needed for Long Beach
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Lemoine vs. Snackbar
- From: "Jason Cruce Trice" <tricejas@pilot.msu.edu>
- Re: Arrogance
- From: Earl Croasmun <croasmun@luna.cas.usf.edu>
- No Subject
- From: Stricksr@ctrvax.Vanderbilt.Edu (Stephen Renaud Stricker)
- HELP (fwd) HELP
- From: Doyle Srader <DSRADER@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU> Dallas Perkins <dperkins@HUSC.HARVARD.EDU>
- Re: Lemoine vs. Snackbar
- From: Aaron R Klemz <Aaron.R.Klemz-1@tc.umn.edu>
- Lemoine v. Achten
- From: Susan J Stanfield <suebell@ksu.ksu.edu>
- Re: Net Evidence (was: Chiapas Sources)
- From: wedge@usa1.com (Glenn Ellingson)
- Pointer and Slusher
- From: Rebecca S Opsata <opsata@ksu.ksu.edu>
- Lemoine vs. Snackbar
- From: "Elizabeth A Repko" <repkoeli@pilot.msu.edu>
- Re: Pointer and Slusher
- From: Rebecca S Opsata <opsata@ksu.ksu.edu>
- Re: Lemoine vs. Snackbar
- From: "Geoffrey M Wyatt" <wyattgeo@pilot.msu.edu>
- SPRING TOPICS umkc debate
- From: "David M. Berube" <BERUBE@garnet.cla.sc.edu> mkking@CCTR.UMKC.EDU
- I feel sorry for the rest of the UMKC squad
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Re: Lemoine vs. Snackbar
- From: Terry Noland <dnoland@selu.edu>
- Speed/MPJ
- From: WHITNEMR@snymorva.cs.snymor.edu
- Re: SB**!!- Bear is WRONG.
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Electronic and open forum evidence - a word from one committee
- From: Kenneth Broda-Bahm <broda@midget.towson.edu>
- Other Evidence issues
- From: Kenneth Broda-Bahm <broda@midget.towson.edu>
- Lemoine and Achten
- From: "Andrea G. Looby" <alooby@moose.uvm.edu>
- ARKANSAS TECH TOUR-
- From: ROBERT BOLEN 0458 <SJRB@ATUVM.ATU.EDU>
- Re: Lemoine and Achten Need to hear from UCO
- From: "Andrea G. Looby" <alooby@moose.uvm.edu> "Richard L. Hathaway" <rhathawa@lonestar.jpl.utsa.edu>
- RE: Speed
- From: batesbenj@urvax.urich.edu
- Re: Lemoine vs. Snackbar
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Re: SB**!!- Bear is WRONG.
- From: "M. Benson" <mbenson@u.washington.edu>
- Re: Lemoine and Achten
- From: Rebecca S Opsata <opsata@ksu.ksu.edu>
- Re: Speed
- From: dmuschel@mail.gac.peachnet.edu (David Muschell)
- Re: Arrogance Ok, things are becoming more clear to me. You seem to view debate I believe that debate is PRIMARILY an argumentation activity, but I did do what you suggested for many years. I heard the debate and You indicate that you would not force your position on my debaters, My goal in starting this line was to check and see if there was a
- From: mdugaw@wln.com (Mike Dugaw)
- A clarification on my feeling sorry
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Re: SB**!!- Bear is WRONG.
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Forwarded mail....
- From: Terry Noland <dnoland@selu.edu>
- re: New Tournament - Please read
- From: Josh <IFJXH@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU>
- Pointer and Slusher's reply
- From: emslusher@CCTR.UMKC.EDU
- RE: Speed
- From: Earl Croasmun <croasmun@luna.cas.usf.edu>
- Re: Other Evidence issues
- From: Kenneth Broda-Bahm <broda@midget.towson.edu>
- re: New Tournament - Please read
- From: vonburg <vonburg@asu.edu>
- POINTER AND SLUSHER'S APOLOGYALL THAT THIS IS A VERY SIMPLISTIC STATEMENT. UMKC HAS ALWAYS HAD A REPUTATIONFOR HARDWORKING DEBATERS AND AN EXCELLENT COACHING STAFF. BY ALLOWING POINTERAND SLUSHER TO DO THEIR GRANDSTANDING ON THE L AND ASSOCIATING THEMSELVES WITHCARDS? UNFORTUNATELY, NO ONE KNOWS THE ANSWER. PERHAPS IT IS FRUSTRATION WITH THE TOPIC, TOO MUCH ALCOHOL, OR LACK OF ANY COMMON SENSE OR COURTESY TO OURSOMEONE CAN GET THEM TO UNDERSTAND THAT SAYING "SORRY" TO COVER THEIR ASSES,
- From: jdotson@CCTR.UMKC.EDU
- Korcok, Necrophilia, and Bozos
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- The Boyle
- From: "Richard L. Hathaway" <rhathawa@lonestar.jpl.utsa.edu>
- Re: Arrogance
- pointer and slusher's reply
- From: hyaffe@CCTR.UMKC.EDU
- Re: SPRING TOPICS
- From: Jonathan T Honiball <honiball@hopper.unh.edu>
- Need to get in touch with SIU
- From: David Hotchkin <dhotchki@pepperdine.edu>
- More on arrogance...
- a bit of support I am writing, as one who has debated for UMKC this past semester, to add I think that some members of the UMKC squad are going a little too far in I do not think that there was any malicious intent on Pointer and I honestly beleive, from personal experience, that everyone has either I have offered to install a "keyboard breath-a-lizer" on their computers. Arrogance/speed
- From: tbarnes@CCTR.UMKC.EDU Pacedebate@aol.com
- out of context
- Re: Net Evidence (was: Chiapas Sources) UMKC
- From: Steven Hunt <hunt@lclark.edu> ocallaghan kellie an <z947427@oats.farm.niu.edu>
- Re: SPRING TOPICS
- From: Gary Larson <g-larson@david.wheaton.edu>
- UMKC, a Lame List, and Apologies
- From: "D. Kirk Wylie" <wylie@triton.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
- Ev from the Internet
- From: mroskoski@cctr.umkc.edu (Matthew K. Roskoski)
- Re: Net Evidence (was: Chiapas Sources)
- From: "Sue E. Lowrie" <suee@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- Re: Ev from the Internet
- From: batesbenj@urvax.urich.edu
- DOF and release time
- From: Michael Dreher <p010195b@pbfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us>
- SPRING TOPIC
- From: "David M. Berube" <BERUBE@garnet.cla.sc.edu>
- Re: Net Evidence (was: Chiapas Sources)
- From: Steven Hunt <hunt@lclark.edu>
- Re: out of context
- From: wedge@usa1.com (Glenn Ellingson)
- FINAL ON MEXICO
- From: "David M. Berube" <BERUBE@garnet.cla.sc.edu>
- FINAL ON MEXICO
- From: "David M. Berube" <BERUBE@garnet.cla.sc.edu>
- Re: Net Evidence (was: Chiapas Sources)
- From: Earl Croasmun <croasmun@luna.cas.usf.edu>
- Re: out of context - Mazarr?
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Hopper's Critique of Me
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- **!! Bear and Ethics (or lack of) On Wed, 13 Dec 1995, Bear replied to my post, in it he made some
- From: BEBT84D@prodigy.com ( RICK MILLER)
- Re: Ev from the Internet
- From: Terry Noland <dnoland@selu.edu>
- Re: out of context
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Re: **!! Bear and Ethics (or lack of)
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Re: Net Evidence (was: Chiapas Sources) Re: SPRING TOPICS
- From: "Maxwell D. Schnurer" <mschnure@moose.uvm.edu> Jason <jhartwig@jinx.sckans.edu>
- Why Net Evidence is Great
- From: dumas@gonzaga.edu (James M. Dumas)
- Internet Ev and Electronic Eaves-Dropping
- From: mroskoski@cctr.umkc.edu (Matthew K. Roskoski)
- Re: Net Evidence (was: Chiapas Sources)
- From: "Sue E. Lowrie" <suee@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- Re: Ev from the Internet
- From: Earl Croasmun <croasmun@luna.cas.usf.edu>
- Balkanization of Knowledge
- From: Earl Croasmun <croasmun@luna.cas.usf.edu>
- Blinders and Balkanization (net evidence)
- From: dumas@gonzaga.edu (James M. Dumas)
- Re: Why Net Evidence is Great
- From: Earl Croasmun <croasmun@luna.cas.usf.edu>
- Re: Internet Ev and Electronic Eaves-Dropping
- From: "Sue E. Lowrie" <suee@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- Dumas and net evidence....
- out of context...
- Mazarr and context(sorry about the stuff at the top)
- From: emslusher@CCTR.UMKC.EDU IN%"Postmaster@CCTR.UMKC.EDU" 14-DEC-1995 13:39:09.32
- Topic Selection Proposals
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Tournaments-IE and Public Debate
- Re: SPRING TOPICS
- From: Gary Larson <g-larson@david.wheaton.edu>
- Re: SPRING TOPIC
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Re: out of context
- From: "Anthony M. Penders" <apenders@seattleu.edu>
- Net Ev, A Question of DegreeHello, Randi here again. Having just demonstrated that it is indeed
- From: mroskoski@cctr.umkc.edu (Matthew K. Roskoski)
- Re: Korcok, Necrophilia, and Bozos
- From: Brent Nordstrom <nordstb@alleg.EDU>
- Re: Ev from the Internet
- From: Terry Noland <dnoland@selu.edu>
- Why The Solution to Net Evidence Needs to be In round
- From: dumas@gonzaga.edu (James M. Dumas)
- Slusher etc.
- From: Josh <IFJXH@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU>
- An apology
- From: Terry Noland <dnoland@selu.edu>
- Re: Hopper's Critique of Me
- From: Harris Martin C <mch766s@nic.smsu.edu>
- Re: Hopper's Critique of Me
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Backchannel Warning
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Tuna's topic proposal
- .
- From: Ender <ender@whidbey.net>
- Re: .
- From: Ender <ender@whidbey.net>
- Request: Mail Bomb Bear
- From: Stefan Andre Bauschard <bauscsa4@wfu.edu>
- Re: Pointer and Slusher's reply Cases and researching
- From: "Leah (Tex) Castella" <castella@lclark.edu> nine inch nail <symondac@whitman.edu>
- Mr. Hopper's Critique of Me
- From: John Fritch <JEF229F@vma.smsu.edu>
- Re: Nordstrom, Korcok, Necrophilia, and Bozos
- From: mroskoski@cctr.umkc.edu (Matthew K. Roskoski)
- Re: Tuna's topic proposal
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Re: Cases and researching
- From: David Hotchkin <dhotchki@pepperdine.edu>
- Summons to appear in court
- From: mroskoski@cctr.umkc.edu (Matthew K. Roskoski)
- glowing aliens & tequila
- From: Stricksr@ctrvax.Vanderbilt.Edu (Stephen Renaud Stricker)
- nonflow and speed
- From: Michael Miroslav Korcok <mk48@cornell.edu>
- Spring Topic & Berube
- From: "Jason Cruce Trice" <tricejas@pilot.msu.edu>
- David & Spring Topic
- From: "Jason Cruce Trice" <tricejas@pilot.msu.edu>
- guilty, guilty, guilty
- From: Michael Miroslav Korcok <mk48@cornell.edu>
- Garmon and speed
- From: Michael Miroslav Korcok <mk48@cornell.edu>
- Re: Summons to appear in court
- **Bear: Illogical and still wrong
- From: BEBT84D@prodigy.com ( RICK MILLER)
- MPJ in Japan
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Re: **Bear: Illogical and still wrong
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Re: nonflow and speed
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Re: glowing aliens & tequila
- From: baker@lightspeed.net
- Re: Other Evidence issues
- From: Kenneth Broda-Bahm <broda@midget.towson.edu>
- **Bear, King o' the straw person fallacy
- From: BEBT84D@prodigy.com ( RICK MILLER)
- If she weighs the same as a duck, she made a new argument
- From: mroskoski@cctr.umkc.edu (Matthew K. Roskoski)
- Nonflow & Speed
- From: WHITNEMR@snymorva.cs.snymor.edu
- Lemoine vs. Snackbar -Reply
- From: Glen Strickland <STRICKLG@esumail.emporia.edu>
- Re: Lemoine and Achten -Reply
- From: Glen Strickland <STRICKLG@esumail.emporia.edu>
- CASE LIST UPDATE PROPOSAL
- From: James Michael Dumas <jmd9@crux3.cit.cornell.edu>
- WJC debate tourney, Jan 4-6
- From: Gina Lane <laneg@william.jewell.edu>
- SPRING TOPICS, Berube, Larson, New Procedure
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Re: Blinders and Balkanization (net evidence)
- From: Earl Croasmun <croasmun@luna.cas.usf.edu>
- christmas email
- sign-up
- From: Eric Preston Fletcher <epf10@csufresno.edu>
- Re: Summons to appear in court
- From: "Jason Cruce Trice" <tricejas@pilot.msu.edu>
- Re: glowing aliens & tequila
- From: Pat Gehrke <pjgehrke@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- CEDA-L Archives
- From: James Michael Dumas <jmd9@crux3.cit.cornell.edu>
- Re: NDT eligibility and Bear
- From: ross smith <smithr@wfu.edu>
- Chip&THe BOss & Agriculture
- From: "Jason Cruce Trice" <tricejas@pilot.msu.edu>
- 'bye
- From: Meredith Garmon <sgarmon@dubois.fisk.edu>
- Miami
- From: "Vikas N Shah" <shahvika@pilot.msu.edu>
- Re: NDT eligibility and Bear
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Re: NDT eligibility and Bear
- From: "Maxwell D. Schnurer" <mschnure@moose.uvm.edu>
- CEDA-L Archives May Hurt You - Caution CEDA-L Archives May Hurt You - Caution
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider) asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- need to talk to someone from cornell
- From: nstal6435@ALPHA.NSULA.EDU
- flamefreeweek
- I need to talk to certain people
- From: Gregory Alan Achten <achten@ksu.ksu.edu>
- Skip Eno only (or others from UTSA)
- From: Gregory Alan Achten <achten@ksu.ksu.edu>
- Long Beach
- From: Matthew Taylor <taylorm@csulb.edu>
- apology Where is Waldo ... er ... Todd Graham? (humor)
- From: emslusher@CCTR.UMKC.EDU asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- new arguments and fairness
- posts and consequences
- From: Michael Miroslav Korcok <mk48@cornell.edu>
- Re: NDT Eligibilty and Bear
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Re: posts and consequences
- From: Michael Bryant <MBRYANT@central.weber.edu>
- Whitman Tournament
- From: Jim Hanson <HANSONJB@WPOFFICE.WHITMAN.EDU>
- Re: flamefreeweek (You're trying to trick us... It won't work.)
- From: mroskoski@cctr.umkc.edu (Matthew K. Roskoski)
- NCAA
- From: "Ian T Klinkhamer" <klinkham@pilot.msu.edu>
- "We must chill messages which chill messages"
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Tuna the censor
- From: Michael Miroslav Korcok <mk48@cornell.edu>
- Greg Achten
- From: "Jason Cruce Trice" <tricejas@pilot.msu.edu>
- Tim: On Crack? (It's a question and therefore not actionable.)
- From: mroskoski@cctr.umkc.edu (Matthew K. Roskoski)
- Re: Tuna the censor
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Pointer or Slusher
- From: sulliv75@pilot.msu.edu (John Sullivan)
- out of contextWhy bother with evidence if it is just a doesn't represent that author's view.
- Help! If You Care To.
- K-State high yield wheat cites MSU again
- From: nslow4912@ALPHA.NSULA.EDU nsmar6758@ALPHA.NSULA.EDU
- re:new tournament part three
- From: Josh <IFJXH@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU>
- MPJ Data
- From: Aaron R Klemz <Aaron.R.Klemz-1@tc.umn.edu>
- Orange Invitational
- From: "Michael K. Davis" <davismk@mailbox.syr.edu>
- Syracuse Round Robin
- From: "Michael K. Davis" <davismk@mailbox.syr.edu>
- Grad Assistant
- From: "Michael K. Davis" <davismk@mailbox.syr.edu>
- Melissa Wade
- From: "Roy H. Eno" <reno@lonestar.jpl.utsa.edu>
- CEDA Home Page
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- CEDA Call for Papers and Studies
- Miami
- From: "Vikas N Shah" <shahvika@pilot.msu.edu>
- ADI
- From: Josh <IFJXH@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU>
- Oceans card cite
- From: Doyle Srader <DSRADER@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
- Missing a name
- From: Jasmine Catherine Abdel-Khalik <jca5@cornell.edu>
- Pt Loma's Sunset Cliffs' Classic
- From: rutledSC@cars.ptloma.edu (SkipRutledge)
- Re: Net Evidence (was: Chiapas Sources)
- From: zab@garnet.berkeley.edu
- Re: Santa Claus (not really, so calm down)
- From: zab@garnet.berkeley.edu
- Let's open the p20 can of worms again
- From: zab@garnet.berkeley.edu
- Re: Speed
- From: zab@garnet.berkeley.edu
- Long Beach Entries
- From: Matthew Taylor <taylorm@csulb.edu>
- Re: Let's open the p20 can of worms again
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Re: Santa Claus (not really, so calm down)
- From: Jack Rogers <Jack_Rogers%UT_TYLER@notes.worldcom.com>
- Cites amd stuff
- From: FBLN51A@prodigy.com ( JOSEPH H BOYLE)
- Re: Cites amd stuff
- Re: Cites amd stuff
- From: Matt Siemens <msiemens@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- ;-) Dust, Tagging, Bfield, Wattenberg ;-) bakersfield
- From: Pat Gehrke <pjgehrke@ecst.csuchico.edu> Josh <IFJXH@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU>
- Re: bakersfield
- From: peterson@lightspeed.net
- Watterburg et al
- From: FBLN51A@prodigy.com ( JOSEPH H BOYLE)
- Re: Watterburg et al
- From: baker@lightspeed.net
- Wm. Jewell tourney...
- From: griffith@spider.lloyd.com (Jason Griffith)
- One last try: Miami
- From: "Vikas N Shah" <shahvika@pilot.msu.edu>
- Re: Wm. Jewell tourney...
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Re: Wm. Jewell tourney...
- From: "Richard L. Hathaway" <rhathawa@lonestar.jpl.utsa.edu>
- Should/Would arguments
- From: FBLN51A@prodigy.com ( JOSEPH H BOYLE)
- Re: Jewell
- From: ross12@MARSHALL.EDU
- Give Mexico 10,000 tickets
- From: FBLN51A@prodigy.com ( JOSEPH H BOYLE)
- Re: Jewell
- From: baker@lightspeed.net
- Queens College CEDA Tournament
- the chiefs lose??? never!!!
- From: griffith@spider.lloyd.com (Jason Griffith)
- Re: Give Mexico 10,000 tickets
- From: ross12@MARSHALL.EDU
- MARSHALL AT WILLIAM JEWELL
- From: jdotson@CCTR.UMKC.EDU
- Wm Jewell entries
- From: Gina Lane <laneg@william.jewell.edu>
- Re: the chiefs lose??? never!!!
- Long Beach Entries
- From: Matthew Taylor <taylorm@csulb.edu>
- Re: MARSHALL AT WILLIAM JEWELL
- From: ross12@MARSHALL.EDU
- Magic at Jewell?
- From: ross12@MARSHALL.EDU
- cal swing
- From: DAVID ROMANELLI <DROMANEL@corvus.wright.edu>
- marshall and his wacky idea that the chiefs suckSeahawks). He did it to them again last week on an 89-yard return on a punt.
- From: jdotson@CCTR.UMKC.EDU
- Re: Regarding disclosure
- From: "Terry West" <WEST@EDU-SUU-CENTRUM.CN.SUU.EDU>
- Regarding disclosure
- Re: Regarding disclosure
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Re: Regarding disclosure
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- CEDA-L digest 772
- From: Gina Lane <laneg@william.jewell.edu>
- Reply to Tuna re regarding disclosure
- Reply to West re regarding disclosure
- CASE LIST request for certain teams.
- From: griffith@spider.lloyd.com (Jason Griffith)
- Re: Reply to Tuna re regarding disclosure
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Disclsoure and debate, the 1NC To: ceda-l@cornell.edu Disclosure in debate
- From: FBLN51A@prodigy.com ( JOSEPH H BOYLE)
- Re: Regarding disclosure
- From: ross12@MARSHALL.EDU
- Internet Video Debates from Debate Central
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- USC case list from Rd. 1
- Reply to Tuna re disclosure
- Reply to Boyle re disclosure
- Reply to Ross re disclosure
- Re: Reply to Ross re disclosure
- From: ross12@MARSHALL.EDU
- Reply to Ross re disclosure 2
- D. Hatton from SHSU
- From: asnider@moose.uvm.edu (Alfred C. Snider)
- Disclosure and debate, a replt to JKM
- From: "Douglas N. Roubidoux" <droubido@lonestar.jpl.utsa.edu>
- Teams in elims at USC
- New on Debate Central, January, 1996
- disclosure
- From: Josh <IFJXH@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU>
Index created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.0.0 beta 3