Re: [Re: 9-3-6 no! 8-3-6 yes!]]]

[MWBRYANT@aol.com]

Mr. Pittelli,

Thank you so much for "clarifying" your meaning. While I will be more than
happy to shoulder the burden of misinterpreting your post, I simply ask you
to reflect on the possibility that your meaning was difficult to comprehend.
I am not the only one that took offense at what you seemed to be implying, as
Frank's previous post proves.

I'm truly sorry for any misinterpretation and ask that you write more clearly
for us "simpletons." I still think that 9-3-6 is a good idea and am somewhat
troubled by your insistence on ignoring the major point of the thread. 

I do note that this very chain of "misunderstanding" seems to characterize
communication between you and I on the list. Every thread where we have
interacted with each other has, quite frankly, seemed like you were trying to
make some point that you never really articulate. I find our communications
to consist of too much "trolling," so I choose to end this one.

Have a nice life,

Bear

---

• Prev by Date: Re: [Re: Aff Bias]
• Next by Date: [Re: 9-3-6 no! 8-3-6 yes!]]]]
• Prev by thread: [Re: 9-3-6 no! 8-3-6 yes!]]]
• Next by thread: [Fwd: [Re: Aff Bias]]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page