answering Ken

["Michael Miroslav Korcok" <Michael.Miroslav.Korcok@postoffice.mail.cornell.edu>@]

but if that's the game people play (pretend competition makes sense), 
then there are tools and devices that are logically entailed.  as i mention, 
the anti-counterplan post is an introduction to the argument i expect some 
of our teams to use on occasion to respond to some counterplans.

just like "core parametric agreement" is not ultimately what i think 
debate ought to be, but is what i think aff plan focus debate ought 
to be, anti-counterplans are not what debate ought to be, but is what 
"competition" debate ought to be.

take care,
:) michael korcok :)

---

• Prev by Date: ADA restricting critiques
• Next by Date: Re: research sites on the net
• Prev by thread: ADA restricting critiques
• Next by thread: Magic Player's at S.C.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page