[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page
Re: Case "Pimps"
I'm sitting here talking to DAVE GENCO and he seems to think "pimp" serves
as an abbreviation for pre-empt. GENCO also adds,
"I always thought that Shelton was quite the pimp daddy himself."
As for the dump, Dave thinks that it is a better transition than "Now for
the following fecal matter..."
Although, calling it fecal matter may cause GENCO to give a 27 for
honesty.
On Tue, 29 Apr 1997, Rebecca Galetine wrote:
> i have wondered about this one. without claiming to know the answer, i
> will comment that there is nothing *more* compelling as a judge to hear a
> 1N overview that includes the words pimp and dump. don't think i've ever
> given above a 26 in that instance...
>
> On Tue, 29 Apr 1997, Shelton Hill wrote:
>
> > I have lowered the speaker points of more than a few debaters for using
> > the term Case "Pimps." I feel that as exclusionary as debate is
> > already, the use of terms such as "Pimp" only alienate people even
> > more. What do you folks think?
> >
> > Shelton
Follow-Ups:
References:
Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page