[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page

Case "Pimps"

To: ceda-l@cornell.edu
Subject: Case "Pimps"
From: Shelton.Hill@bubbs.biola.edu (Shelton Hill)
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 10:21:30 -0800
Organization: Biola University
Sender: Shelton.Hill@bubbs.biola.edu

I have lowered the speaker points of more than a few debaters for using
the term Case "Pimps." I feel that as exclusionary as debate is
already, the use of terms such as "Pimp" only alienate people even
more. What do you folks think?

Shelton

Follow-Ups:

Re: Case "Pimps"

From: Rebecca Galetine <theloft@accessone.com>

Re: Case "Pimps"

From: Crisis <hobbs@lclark.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Presumption
Next by Date: case "pimps" thread
Prev by thread: Re: Case debate in the 90s ??? (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: Case "Pimps"
Index(es):

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page