Re: Southeast Asia topic

[Graham Berryman <s994172@umslvma.umsl.edu>]

Aaron Moburg-Jones wrote:
> 
> I agree that the recent China topic will not be a problem for the same
> reasons stacy gives.  But there is another obvious reason she leaves out:
> China is not in southeast Asia!  The core areas of the China topic--MFN,
> WTO, US-Sino relations, Chinese proliferation to the middle east, chinese
> coal use--will not be deabted, or if they are, will have a very different
> look to them.
> 
> A few of the core areas will overlap.  Vietnam wants the spratlies.  Some
> people had Chinese invasion of Vietnam scenarios.  the overlap is limited
> to a few areas.
> 
> As someone who debated the China topic, I would be interested in getting
> better aquainted with the rest of the region.  Of course, i am sure i left
> out a few areas of overlap.  If there are more, perhaps they could be
> limited by topic wording.
> 
> Aaron Moburg-Jones
> Gonzaga debateDo you not realize that China is in the Southeast Asian trading bloc 
region?  Additionally, they dominate relations within the region!  Graham

---

References:

• Re: Southeast Asia topic
• From: Aaron Moburg-Jones <amoburg-@gonzaga.edu>

---

• Prev by Date: Martin Che Harris/Re: Civil Rights Topic
• Next by Date: Community Servie - Please Read
• Prev by thread: Re: Southeast Asia topic
• Next by thread: Russia and the FSR's Topic Paper
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

---

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page