[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page
RE: ABC and Benjamin Bates
It is incredibly refreshing to here an eloquent post based upon
open-mindedness rather than bigotry. I won't go into a long post here
because I think Bates said it quite well.
>I am not telling you what to watch on TV. If you see a program and you
>disagree with its content, turn it off. I don't think that a public forum,
>like the airwaves that are owned by the federal government and ONLY leased
>to the corporations, should have its content restricted. If a company is
>willing to pay to make a commercial that portrays homosexuals or an actor or
>actress is brave enough to portray a homosexual character on a regular show,
>then why should the lesee of a public forum (who is supposed to abide by the
>currenntly dormant fairness docctrine) be able to restric tthe voices that
>are heard.
>
>More importantly, I think the underlying attitudes of some posts about
>homosexuals show that there is a fundamental misunderstanding of who
>homosexuals are and how they act. This misunderstanding is what breeds
>contempt, violence, and discrimination against homosexuals and weakens our
>societal fabric. I think that this is a clear call for a broader discussion
>of civil rights and liberties in the community, either as next year's topic
>or in other fora.
I hope there is a tremendous response to TD Barnes post because the
acceptance of bigotry and violence that is implicitly condoned is revolting.
Barnes wrote:
> Besides, the reality
>is that Gays are not "oppressed" unless they choose to reveal there specific
>"BEHAVIORS". (That's' right, BEHAVIOR, not some genetic trait like skin
>color.) The military is a perfect example of this. The Don't ask, Don't tell,
>Don't pursue policy is one thing that Clinton got right. A
>soldier/sailor/marine/airman that reveals an unacceptable behavior like
>homosexuality, beastiality, pedophilia, or just dressing up like Zsa Zsa Gabore
>will face consequences for choosing that particular behavior. In my
>opinion...what someone does in their bedroom is none of my business...if they
>choose to make it public, then they can face the public's reaction.
Ben made the appropriate distinctions between consensual behavior and the
criminal acts against non-consenting children clear. To equate the two is
disgusting. And to silently acquiesce to the "public's reaction" to a
public admission of identity is HORRIFYING. Why is there a difference
between an admission that one is gay and the visibility of a person's skin
color, other than that color is immediately visible? I won't get into this
silly dispute about whether homosexuality is a choice or genetic trait. The
point is that it sounds like TD is the type of person who would stand
silently by on the sidewalk while a gang of whites beat the shit out of an
African-American because of his color, or a Hispanic person, or an Asian
American. That kind of passivity to blatant discrimination, violence, and
hate turns my stomach.
A civil rights topic sounds highly in order.
Kevin Ayotte
University of Pittsburgh
Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page