[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page

testBreaking brackets

To: ceda-l@CORNELL.EDU
To: The CEDA Listserve <ceda-l@cornell.edu>
Subject: test
Subject: Breaking brackets
From: Josh <IFJXH@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU>
From: Kenneth Broda-Bahm <broda@midget.towson.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 10:30:27 -0700 (MST)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 13:43:28 -0400 (EDT)
e-mail: IFJXH@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU

I think that Gary's argument for re-seeding would remove much of the most 
visible distortion.  But, if we don't go for that idea it will be because 
we believe that the upset team has 'earned' its upset, in which case we 
should no longer be looking to their prelim record, but to their seeding 
alone.  And in that case, the 'distortion' will be one or two places.

In either case, the bracket is our servant not our master.  Our more 
important purpose should be to promote debate.

--Ken Broda-Bahm

Prev by Date: student leadership
Next by Date: Re: More than bracket breaking -Reply
Prev by thread: student leadership
Next by thread: subject??
Index(es):

Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page

testBreaking brackets

testBreaking brackets