[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page

Re: Malibu Beach Parties

> 
> According to Jonathon Stanton and Michael Korcok, the pole shift that
> respected scientists discuss is fundamentally different from the one in the
> earth-bound alien journal.  Eistein was talking about a magnetic shift,
> which I think has happened before?  Maybe this is why the credible sources
> didn't flame as much as did the alien.

In all fairness Bill, there are two kinds of pole shifts indicated in the
topic literature.  The magnetic pole shift has all sorts of empirical data
and is distinct from the pole shift written about by Einstein and Noone. 
Noone reinterprets the evidence and evidentiary holes supporting plate
techtonic and contintental drift theory.  He argues that the shifts of the
continents from the original land mass called Pangea (for all of you
geology buffs) is not caused by random stress and fault lines within the
earth's crust.  Rather, periodically the planets enter a brief period of
alignment when the gravitational forces exterted on the Earth vary
extremely and the planets crust is pulled in opposing directions.  This
causes planetary devastation...Today's earthquakes and faultlines are
caused by remaining shifts in the plates that haven't completely resettled
since the last pole shift.  The info is pretty interesting if not
realistic - it's just like a lot of other flakey theories debate has
introduced to the communication world.  Besides the timeframe will get
better each year that goes by... :)

Martian terraforming was the _only_ topical case and also the funnest to
run!!!

Michael Hotchin
Pepperdine
References:
Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page