[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page
Re: The Judges Will Have a Lot of Explaining to Do! (fwd)
On Sat, 8 Apr 1995, Norah E. Dunbar wrote:
>
> I was present for the quarters round in which Elizabeth told the judges
> on the pannel that "they would have a lot of explaining to do" if she
> lost this round. While I view this as a tactic of a losing team in a
> critical round I do see it a lot. I find it extremely insulting. I have
> added to my judging philosophy for Phi Rho Pi nationals that I can not be
> scared into voting for any team. The debater who says this is implying
> that the critic is making a hasty decision or a decision that he or she can
> simply not explain. I have never made a decision I can not explain. If
> this tactic was ever used in front of me, I would probably be more inclined
> to find a way a way to vote the other way, although that would violate my own
> "least intervention" philosophy.
>
Follow-Ups:
References:
Archive created by Jonathan Stanton (jonathan@cs.jhu.edu)
Return to main CEDA-L Archive Page